Consider question #21 part a:

Here is the solution:

However, consider the definition of a total order relation:

The solution didn't prove that the relation is a partial order relation. This is a mistake in the solution, right?
Consider question #21 part a:

Here is the solution:

However, consider the definition of a total order relation:

The solution didn't prove that the relation is a partial order relation. This is a mistake in the solution, right?
Copyright © 2021 JogjaFile Inc.
"Consider the "divides" relation..."
It is assumed that you are aware that divisibility is a partial order relation...