there is some thing in pumping lemma that I don't understand it.
I think about application to prove irregularity of language.
We have for each word (actual length) find partition: $xyz$ such that $\forall i \ge 0 xy^iz \in L$.
So we can find word, but tell me - if we can choose partition ? (so choose $y$) ? Maybe we should check each possible partition ?
2026-03-25 15:40:08.1774453208
pumping lemma - choice of partition
655 Views Asked by user343207 https://math.techqa.club/user/user343207/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in COMPUTER-SCIENCE
- What is (mathematically) minimal computer architecture to run any software
- Simultaneously multiple copies of each of a set of substrings of a string.
- Ackermann Function for $(2,n)$
- Algorithm for diophantine equation
- transforming sigma notation into harmonic series. CLRS A.1-2
- Show that if f(n) is O(g(n) and d(n) is O(h(n)), then f(n) + d(n) is O(g(n) + h(n))
- Show that $2^{n+1}$ is $O(2^n)$
- If true, prove (01+0)*0 = 0(10+0)*, else provide a counter example.
- Minimum number of edges that have to be removed in a graph to make it acyclic
- Mathematics for Computer Science, Problem 2.6. WOP
Related Questions in FORMAL-LANGUAGES
- Simultaneously multiple copies of each of a set of substrings of a string.
- Do these special substring sets form a matroid?
- Exitstance of DPA of L = $\{ww^r\}$
- Automata defined by group presentations.
- Constructing context free grammar with a number constraint to one of the elements in the language
- Converting CFG to a regular expression
- CSG for the language $\{a^{n^2}|n>0\}$
- If true, prove (01+0)*0 = 0(10+0)*, else provide a counter example.
- Proof of "Extension" for Rice's Theorem
- Prove that this sentence is a tautology.
Related Questions in REGULAR-LANGUAGE
- Converting CFG to a regular expression
- How to approach regular languages using the pumping lemma?
- How to prove by induction that a string is a member of a recursively defined language?
- Formally expressing regular expression
- Deciding wether a language is regular, in the arithmetic hierarchy
- How to derive the set notation from regular expressions?
- Given language, say if it is regular, context-free and proove it.
- Given L1 is regular language and L1△L2 is regular is L2 regular?
- Proving a Language is Regular via Automata
- How to prove that a transformed language is regular using an NFA
Related Questions in PUMPING-LEMMA
- Given language, say if it is regular, context-free and proove it.
- How to calculate the minimum pumping length for some L?
- Pumping lemma proof and minimum length
- Pumping lemma for $L=\{a^{p}b^{q} ∣ 0 ≤ p ≤ q\}$
- To show that language is not regular using pumping lemma
- PL to prove a language is not regular
- Proving language is not regular using pumping lemma
- is a fractional i allowed in pumping lemma??
- Proving that $L=\{xww^r\mid x,w \in \{0,1\}^+\}$ is not regular
- Pumping lemma: Convert pumped, binary string $xy^iz$to integer
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Recall that all regular langauges satisfy the pumping lemma, which we capture by the following informal proposition: $$\text{regular}\implies\text{pumping lemma}.$$ Applying modus tollens (a.k.a. contrapositive), we get $$\neg\text{pumping lemma}\implies\neg\text{regular}.$$ Therefore, to prove a language is not regular, it suffices to show that it does not satisfy the pumping lemma. For any regular language $L$, the pumping lemma states the following: $$ \exists p\geq1(\forall w(\left|w\right|\geq p\Rightarrow\exists x,y,z(w=xyz\wedge\left|y\right|\geq1\wedge\left|xy\right|\leq p\wedge\forall i\geq0(xy^{i}z\in L)))) $$ Taking the negation of this statement, $$ \forall p\geq1(\exists w(\left|w\right|\geq p\wedge\forall x,y,z(w=xyz\Rightarrow(y=\epsilon\vee\left|xy\right|>p\vee\exists i\geq0(xy^{i}z\notin L))))) $$ As you can see, we have to show that for all pumping lengths $p$, there exists a word $w$ at least as long as the pumping length $p$ such that for all partitions $w=xyz$, at least one of the following is true: (i) $y$ is the empty string (i.e. $w=xz$), (ii) $|xy|$ is greater than the pumping length, or (iii) there exists an $i$ such that the pumped string $xy^{i}z$ is not in $L$.
If any one of (i) or (ii) is true for a partition, we need not consider it in our proof by contradiction. Therefore, we can look only at partitions for which (i) and (ii) are false, and try to show that (iii) is true. The example on Wikipedia is quite helpful in demonstrating this. It is paraphrased below: