I have a problem with this equation:
!
I manage to find the first solution, which is x =-1 but it seems that there is another solution, which is x ≈ -1.19896. How do we do this, I can't seem to find any thread about solving exponential equation where the base is a variable itself.
Thank you!
The values $x+2=1$ and $x+3=2$ are compatible giving the apparent equality $2^2=4$ hence $x=-1$ is a solution.
Taking into account the convexity of the exponential function ($(x+3)^{x+2}=e^{(x+2)(\ln(x+3)}$), if a line passing through a point on the curve is not tangent to the curve then this line cuts the curve in another point. We search for another point distinct of $(-1,2)$.
We have clearly the equivalent equation $$(x+3)^{x+2}=2(x+2)$$ Make $$\begin{cases}f(x)= (x+3)^{x+2}\\g(x)=2x+4\end{cases}$$ One has $$f\space’(x)= (x+3)^{x+1}(x+2+(x+3)\ln (x+3))$$ and it is apparent both that $ f\space’(-2)=0$ (which certainly corresponds to a minimum because of the convexity) and that $y=2x+4$ is not tangent to the curve. It follows there is a second solution so one has to solve a transcendental equation. We calculate approximations as usual. $$\begin{cases}f(-1)=g(-1)=2\\f(-1.1)=1.9^{0.9}\approx 1.78187\text{ and }g(-1.1)=1.8\\f(-1.2)=1.8^{0.8}\approx 1.60036\text{ and }g(-1.2)=1.6\end{cases}$$ since $$f(-1.1)\lt g(-1.1)\text { and }\space f(-1.2)\gt g(-1.2)$$ there is a point solution $x_0$ such that $$-1.2\lt x_0\lt-1.1$$ this is an small interval, of length $0.1$, that can be narrowed more and more by successive approximations. We stop here saying that the solution $x_0\approx -1.19896$ given by the O.P. can be approximated this way.