I have the following:
Premise: ((V → ¬W) ∧ (X → Y))
Premise: (¬W → Z)
Premise: (V ∧ X)
|- (Z ∧Y)
The part I want to know is how do I go about separating the second premise ¬W so that it becomes ¬Z or (W → Z)
I have heard of doing double negation (¬¬W → ¬Z) but still unsure how to proceed from here.
As said in the comments, you don't need to split the second premise. Here you can use the conjunction elimination ($X\land Y \vdash X$, $X\land Y \vdash Y$), conjunction introduction ($X,Y\vdash X\land Y$) and modus ponens ($X,X\rightarrow Y\vdash Y$).
If I number you premises :
Now you can apply conjunction elimination on 1. and 3. which gives you
$X\rightarrow Y$
$V$
Here you can see that if you use modus ponens on 6., 4. you get $\neg W$. This $\neg W$ is on the left of premise 2. So again using modus ponens, you get $Z$.
To get $Y$, you must use modus ponens one last time with 7. and 5.
Conjunction introdution gives you $Z\land Y$.
Here is what I get in Fitch notation :