Consider the following, I try to prove a limit, and get $\frac \varepsilon 3$=$\delta$. So, the length $\delta$ $<$ $\varepsilon$. My question is how will every $\varepsilon$ correspond with a single and unique $\delta$?
Question regarding $\varepsilon$-$\delta$
97 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail AtThere are 2 best solutions below
On
Daàvid has already answered the question at hand, but I'll do my best to explain the motivation behind why we define limits in this way. Recall that we say $\lim_{x \to a}f(x) = L$ if and only if
For every $\varepsilon > 0$ there exists $\delta > 0$ such that, for all $x$, if $0<|x-a|<\delta$, then $|f(x)-L|<\varepsilon$.
This definition looks pretty complicated, but the idea that it is trying to capture is actually not too tricky. When we say, for instance, that the limit as $x$ approaches $0$ of $\sin x/x$ equals $1$, what we mean is that as $x$ gets closer and closer to $0$, the value of $\sin x/x$ gets arbitrarily close to $1$. In other words, the difference between $\sin x / x$ and $1$ eventually becomes smaller than any tiny number (which we often denote as $\varepsilon$). More precisely, we can make $|\sin x/x - 1|$ smaller than any positive $\varepsilon$ by requiring that $0<|x|<\delta$. If we want $\sin x / x$ to get really close to $1$, then we might have to require that $x$ is really close to $0$ (but not equal to $0$). This shows that depending on how small the $\varepsilon$ is, the value of $\delta$ might have to be small, very small, or extremely small. The point is that no matter how close we want $\sin x / x$ to get to $1$, it is possible to get there by requiring that $\delta$ is sufficiently small. How small that $\delta$ needs to be is dependent on the particular $\varepsilon$.
If you have $\lim_{x \to a} f(x) = l$ then for every $\epsilon$ there is a $\delta$ such that for every $x \in D$ (where D is the domain of $f$) with $|x-a|\lt \delta $, you have that $|f(x) - l|<\epsilon$ by definition. Take one of these $\epsilon$'s and one $\delta$ that does the trick for that $\epsilon$. Now, take any $0<\delta_{o}<\delta$. Then, for any $x \in D$ with $|x-a|<\delta_{0}<\delta$, we have by definition of $\delta$ that $|f(x)-l|<\epsilon$. With this we conclude that there is actually never uniqueness of a $\delta$ correspondent to some $\epsilon$, since in the real numbers, there is always a $0<\delta_{0}<\delta$. And for each of these $\delta_{0}$, the condition is also satisfied. So the possible $\delta$'s are always infinite for each $\epsilon$