I am self-studying probability theory, and I am having quite some problems with the very basic concepts of the theory that are seriously hampering any attempt to proceed further in my study.
Here there is one basic problem I am having, with my thoughts (written in italic) about it.
Assume the following:
- $(\Omega, \Sigma, \mu)$ is a probability space,
- $X$ is a continuous r.v.,
- $(\mathbb{R}, \mathcal{B}_\mathbb{R}, P)$ is the probability space induced by $X$ (where $\mathcal{B}_\mathbb{R}$ is the Borel $\sigma$-algebra),
- $f_X$ is the PDF of $X$,
- $F_X$ is the CDF of $X$.
When we talk about the expectation functional with respect to the r.v. $X$ we write $$ \mathbf{E} (X) := \int_\Omega X d\mu. \hspace{4cm}(*)$$ Why is this the case? To me it looks we should rather write $$ \mathbf{E} (X) := \int_\Omega X dP,$$ because the r.v. works on the induced probability space that has $P$ has the reference probability measure.
Any feedback is most welcome.
Thank you for your time.
Following the notations you gave, $E(X) = \int_\Omega X d\mu$ is correct, since $X$ is a function defined on the measure space $(\Omega, \Sigma, \mu)$, so more explicitly, we can write $$E(X) = \int_\Omega X(\omega) \mu(d \omega) $$ to highlight the integration is taken on the space $\Omega$ with respect to the measure $\mu$ defined on $\Sigma$. $E(X) = \int_\Omega X dP$ does not make sense in that $P$ is not a measure associated to the space $\Omega$.
There does exist an expression for $E(X)$ using the measure $P$ defined on the induced probability space $(\mathbb{R}, \mathscr{B}_{\mathbb{R}}, P)$, known as change of variable formula, as follows: $$E(X) = \int_\mathbb{R} x dP = \int_{\mathbb{R}} x P(dx),$$ which makes sense in that the function $x \mapsto x$ is a function defined on $\mathbb{R}$.
Remark: However, the notations you introduced are a little non-standard. Conventionally, we use $P$ as the probability measure defined on the original space $(\Omega, \Sigma)$, while use $\mu$ as the probability measure on the induced space $(\mathbb{R}, \mathscr{B}_{\mathbb{R}})$, which is exactly opposite to your notations.