Is there an explicit enumeration of the Church-Kleene ordinal $\omega_1^{CK}$? A general explanation of what it means for an ordinal to be computable and/or recursively enumerable could be helpful too.
2026-03-27 03:00:02.1774580402
Recursively Enumerable Ordinals
163 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in SET-THEORY
- Theorems in MK would imply theorems in ZFC
- What formula proved in MK or Godel Incompleteness theorem
- Proving the schema of separation from replacement
- Understanding the Axiom of Replacement
- Ordinals and cardinals in ETCS set axiomatic
- Minimal model over forcing iteration
- How can I prove that the collection of all (class-)function from a proper class A to a class B is empty?
- max of limit cardinals smaller than a successor cardinal bigger than $\aleph_\omega$
- Canonical choice of many elements not contained in a set
- Non-standard axioms + ZF and rest of math
Related Questions in ORDINALS
- Ordinals and cardinals in ETCS set axiomatic
- For each cardinal number $u$, there exists a smallest ordinal number $\alpha$ such that card$\alpha$ =$u$ .
- Intuition regarding: $\kappa^{+}=|\{\kappa\leq\alpha\lt \kappa^{+}\}|$
- Set membership as a relation on a particular set
- Goodstein's sequences and theorem.
- A proof of the simple pressing down lemma, is sup $x=x?$
- $COF(\lambda)$ is stationary in $k$, where $\lambda < k$ is regular.
- Difficulty in understanding cantor normal form
- What are $L_1$ and $L_2$ in the Gödel Constructible Hierarchy
- How many subsets are produced? (a transfinite induction argument)
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
No, $\omega_1^{CK}$ is not remotely close to computable. It turns out that it isn't even hyperarithmetic.
Precisely, we say that a linear order $\alpha$ has a computable copy if there is a computable binary relation $\triangleleft$ on $\omega$ such that $(\omega,\triangleleft)$ is a linear order isomorphic to $\alpha$. Note that this $\triangleleft$ will not be unique: a given linear order may have many different "computable copies." Of course "computable" here can be replaced with any other complexity notion - e.g. hyperarithmetic - and similarly we can talk about computable copies of structures in general (e.g. groups, rings, fields, ...) by looking at things other than just binary relations. We can also relativize, and talk about structures with copies computable (or hyperarithmetic, or etc.) relative to a given real.
We often abuse terminology and talk about "computable ordinals" (or groups, or rings, or ...) to refer to ordinals which have computable copies.
Surprisingly, for ordinals computability is a very coarse notion: Spector proved that an ordinal $\alpha$ (thought of as a linear ordering) has a hyperarithmetic copy iff it has a computable copy. So $\omega_1^{CK}$ isn't just noncomputable, it's extremely far from computable.
A good source for this is Ash/Knight's book Computable structures and the hyperarithmetic hierarchy.
This is all also tied to another more technical notion of $\omega_1^{CK}$ being "hard to enumerate," namely admissibility:
EDIT: it's worth noting that there is a converse here, namely that for countable $\alpha$ we have that $\alpha$ is admissible (= $L_\alpha\models$ KP+inf) iff $\alpha=\omega_1^{CK}(r)$ for some $r$. However, note that this does not mean that $r\in L_\alpha$ in such a case (take e.g. $\alpha$ to be an admissible limit of admissibles); we only have the weaker fact that $L_\alpha[r]$ also satisfies KP+inf.
In particular, there is no $\Sigma_1$-over-$L_{\omega_1^{CK}}$ cofinal function from $\omega$ to $\omega_1^{CK}$. And all the usual ways of climbing up ordinals are much much simpler than that. So you really have to break out some big guns to climb up to $\omega_1^{CK}$ from below.
Details of all this can be found in Sacks' book Higher recursion theory.