I am curious if it is possible to cut the triangle with vertices (0,0), (0,1), (1,0) into many polygonal pieces and only translate each piece appropriately to construct the triangle with vertices (1,1), (0,1), (1,0). I don't see a simple reason why this is not possible.
2026-03-26 04:34:09.1774499649
recutting a polygon to obtain its flip
46 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in GEOMETRY
- Point in, on or out of a circle
- Find all the triangles $ABC$ for which the perpendicular line to AB halves a line segment
- How to see line bundle on $\mathbb P^1$ intuitively?
- An underdetermined system derived for rotated coordinate system
- Asymptotes of hyperbola
- Finding the range of product of two distances.
- Constrain coordinates of a point into a circle
- Position of point with respect to hyperbola
- Length of Shadow from a lamp?
- Show that the asymptotes of an hyperbola are its tangents at infinity points
Related Questions in POLYGONS
- Can the relocation of one control point of a NURBS curve be compensated by an adjustment of some weights?
- Need a hint regarding this question...
- How do I detect if a circle overlaps with a polygon or not?
- A peculiar Diophantine equation
- Looking for Regular Polygons with a Side to Diagonal ratio Equaling a Metallic Mean
- Calculating the value of $\pi$
- Bounding Numbers for $N>2$
- Generalizing Odom's construction of the golden ratio
- Integrating difficult function over a polygon
- Existence and uniqueness of a Riemann-Hilbert problem involving a polygon
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
The Bolyai-Gerwien Equidecomposability Theorem states that, if $P$ and $Q$ are polygons of the same area, then $P$ and $Q$ are equidecomposable: $P$ can be cut into pieces that re-arrange to make $Q$ (and vice-versa). Proofs tend to follow a route that actually proves something stronger: $P$ can be cut into pieces that can re-arrange via translations and $180^\circ$ rotations to form $Q$ (and vice-versa). A caveat is then made that we generally can't do better than this: Translations alone are not enough.
You can read this type of discussion in these passages from Miklós Laczkovich's "Conjecture and Proof" . The author proves specifically that a triangle is not translation-equidecomposable with any rectangle; the argument applies to your flipped-triangle case as well. I'll try to summarize.
(It'll take me a while to type that up. I'll post my as-yet-incomplete answer now, so that you can consult the Laczkovich paper in the meantime.)