Let $r,s,t,x,y,z$ be integers, with $rst$ squarefree, such that $$rx^2+sy^2+tz^2=0.$$
I already know that by [one of] Legendre's famous theorem[s], $-rs$ must be a square modulo each prime divisor of $t$, and $-rt$ must be a square modulo each prime divisor of $s$, and $-st$ must be a square modulo each prime divisor of $r$.
Are there any similar tests that can be applied to $x,y,z$ (either in terms of themselves, or $r,s,t$, or all of the above) in order to restrict and/or eliminate possible solutions?
I made one up of the kind you wanted, $$ 3 x^2 = 5 y^2 + 7 z^2. $$ This has a solution because $12 = 5 + 7.$ I was quite surprised that it took four of the Fricke-Klein recipes to account for all of the first three dozen or so primitive integer solutions. I probably have them all, but that needs a proof. First I will put the solutions with $x$ up to some bound, then the section of the program that shows the four 3 by 3 matrices as coefficients of binary quadratic forms. Maybe tomorrow I will also typeset that.
Why not... the four coefficient matrices are
$$ \left( \begin{array}{rrr} 18 & 2 & 2 \\ 12 & 6 & -1 \\ -6 & 6 & 1 \end{array} \right) $$
$$ \left( \begin{array}{rrr} 12 & -2 & 3 \\ 6 & 6 & -2 \\ -6 & 6 & 1 \end{array} \right) $$
$$ \left( \begin{array}{rrr} 11 & 6 & 4 \\ 2 & 10 & 2 \\ -7 & -2 & 2 \end{array} \right) $$
$$ \left( \begin{array}{rrr} 26 & 22 & 6 \\ 1 & 10 & 4 \\ 17 & 14 & 2 \end{array} \right) $$
Next morning. This made much more sense after I looked at the positive binary forms of discriminant $-140,$ including the two imprimitive $\langle 2,2,18 \rangle$ and $\langle 6,2,6 \rangle,$ primitive forms (out of six total) $\langle 3,2,12 \rangle$ and $\langle 4,2,9 \rangle.$ I could, with the same results, have taken the four matrices as
$$ \left( \begin{array}{rrr} 2 & 2 & 18 \\ -1 & -8 & 5 \\ 1 & -4 & -11 \end{array} \right) $$
$$ \left( \begin{array}{rrr} 6 & 2 & 6 \\ 4 & 6 & -3 \\ 2 & -6 & -3 \end{array} \right) $$
$$ \left( \begin{array}{rrr} 3 & 2 & 12 \\ -2 & -6 & 6 \\ 1 & -6 & -6 \end{array} \right) $$
$$ \left( \begin{array}{rrr} 4 & 2 & 9 \\ 2 & -6 & -6 \\ 2 & 6 & -3 \end{array} \right) $$
One thing you can do by hand, to understand this a little better, is take each of these four matrices, one at a time, call it $P,$ and calculate $P^T HP,$ where $H$ is the diagonal matrix $\operatorname{diag}(-3,5,7)$
===================================
jagy@phobeusjunior:~$
====================================
====================================