Here is a summation that is supposed to be solved:
$$S_n = \sum_{i=1}^{n} i$$
The author says it can be solved by substituting with $i = n-j$:
$$\sum_{i=1}^{n} i = \sum_{n-j=1}^{n} (n - j)$$
The next step of the simplification he doesn't explain, nor does he explain any simplification past that:
\begin{align*} & = \sum_{j=0}^{n-1} (n-j)\\ & = \sum_{j=0}^{n-1} n - \sum_{j=0}^{n-1}j\\ & = n \sum_{j=0}^{n-1}1 - \sum_{j=1}^{n}j + n \end{align*}
This isn't the solution yet I have left that out because it's irrelevant.
How was he able to change $\sum_{n-j=1}^{n} (n - j)$ to $\sum_{j=0}^{n-1} (n-j)$? Is that a rule of summation that I am not aware of?
All he's doing is reversing the order of summation. Try writing it out. Originally, $i$ ranges from $1$ to $n$, so our summation is: $$ S_n = 1 + 2 + \cdots + i + \cdots + n $$ After making the substitution $i = n - j \iff j = n - i$, we note that $j$ now ranges backwards from $n-1$ to $n-n$, so our summation is: $$ S_n = [n-(n-1)] + [n-(n-2)] + \cdots + [n-(n-j)] + \cdots + [n - (n-n)] $$ By simplifying the terms in the round brackets and reversing the order of summation, we obtain: $$ S_n = [n - 0] + [n-1] + \cdots + [n-j] + \cdots + [n - (n - 1)] $$ so that now $j$ is ranging from $0$ to $n - 1$.