"Note on the Riemann integral" in chapter 5 of Probability with Martingales by Williams reads:
If, for example, f is a non-negative Riemann integrable function on $([0,1],\mathcal{B}[0,1],Leb)$ with Riemann integral I, then there exists an increasing sequence of elements $(L_n)$ of elements of $SF^+$ and a decreasing sequence $(U_n)$ of elements of $SF^+$ such that
$L_n \uparrow L \leq f, U_n \downarrow U \geq f$
and $\mu(L_n) \uparrow I$,$\mu(U_n) \downarrow I$. If we define
$ \tilde{f} = \begin{cases} L & \text{ if $L=U$} \\ 0 & \text{otherwise} \\ \end{cases} $
then it is clear that $\tilde{f}$ is Borel measurable, while (since $\mu(L) = \mu(U) = 1$) $\{f \neq \tilde{f}\}$ is a subset of the Borel set $\{L \neq U\}$ which Lemma 5.2b showed to be of measure 0
Here, $SF^+$ is the collection of non-negative simple functions
and $\mu(f) :=: \int_{[0,1]} f(s)\mu(ds)$.
My question is: What are L and U?
- I know $L(P,f)$ as the lower Riemann sum of $f$ using partition $P$
- This would lead me to think that L would be the lower Riemann integral (the supremum of $L(P,f)$ taken over the partitions $P$)
BUT
- The $L_n$ are functions, not numbers, and f is a function as well, so the convergence $L_n \uparrow L$ and inequality $L \leq f$ don't make sense.
So, what are $U$ and $L$?
Thank you very much in advance.
I believe what's meant is that the sequence of functions $L_n$ converges to a function $L$ with the property that $L(x) \le f(x)$ for every $x$, and similarly for the $U_n$.
That's certainly true, and seems to make sense in the context given.
As @Nate notes below, this convergence is probably meant to be understood pointwise.