I am currently reading Mumford-Oda book on Algebraic Geometry. On Chapter 1, Definition 6.6 they talk about scheme-functors. Afterwards, it says that scheme-functors are precisely those given by $$F(R)=\text{Mor}(\text{Spec}(R),X)$$ for some scheme X. I tried to prove it, but I could not. What is the main idea?
2026-03-26 08:04:01.1774512241
Scheme-functors
943 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in ALGEBRAIC-GEOMETRY
- How to see line bundle on $\mathbb P^1$ intuitively?
- Jacobson radical = nilradical iff every open set of $\text{Spec}A$ contains a closed point.
- Is $ X \to \mathrm{CH}^i (X) $ covariant or contravariant?
- An irreducible $k$-scheme of finite type is "geometrically equidimensional".
- Global section of line bundle of degree 0
- Is there a variant of the implicit function theorem covering a branch of a curve around a singular point?
- Find Canonical equation of a Hyperbola
- Picard group of a fibration
- Finding a quartic with some prescribed multiplicities
- There is no ring map $\mathbb C[x] \to \mathbb C[x]$ swapping the prime ideals $(x-1)$ and $(x)$
Related Questions in SCHEMES
- Is $ X \to \mathrm{CH}^i (X) $ covariant or contravariant?
- Do torsion-free $\mathcal{O}_X$-modules on curves have dimension one?
- $\mathbb{C}[x,y]$ is the sections of Spec $\mathbb{C}[x,y]$ minus the origin?
- Finitely generated $k-$algebras of regular functions on an algebraic variety
- Is every open affine subscheme of an algebraic $k-$variety an affine $k-$variety?
- Scheme Theoretic Image (Hartshorne Ex.II.3.11.d)
- Is this a closed embedding of schemes?
- Adjunction isomorphism in algebraic geometry
- Closed connected subset of $\mathbb{P}_k^1$
- Why can't closed subschemes be defined in an easier way?
Related Questions in FUNCTORS
- Continuous functor for a Grothendieck topology
- Two morphisms $f, g : M \to L$ are equal as long as they are equal under the limit $L$.
- Co- and contravariance of vectors vs co- and contravariant functors
- Discrete simplicial sets: equivalent definitions, request for a proof
- Simplicial sets, injectivity
- When can functors fail to be adjoints if their hom sets are bijective?
- Example of a functor that doesn't reflect isomorphism
- Equality of functors
- Example of functor not full not faithfull
- Bijective on objects implies essentially surjection
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
In one direction, you need to show that given a scheme $X$, the functor $R \mapsto \text{Mor}(\text{Spec}(R),X)$ satisfies the properties of a scheme-functor.
In the other direction, you need to find a scheme $X$ representing the scheme functor. For this, there is a "geometric realization functor", described in detail (as Mumford and Oda note in their book) by Demazure and Gabriel in their book Groupes Algébriques. Its definition, for any functor $F$, is
$$|F| = \varinjlim_{(R,\rho)} \text{Spec}(R),$$
where the colimit is taken over the category of pairs $(R,\rho)$ for $R$ a commutative ring, and $\rho \in F(R)$, with morphisms $(R,\rho) \to (R',\rho')$ being morphisms $f: R \to R'$ such that $F(f)(\rho) = \rho'$. Note by Yoneda's Lemma, an element $\rho \in F(R)$ corresponds to a morphism of functors $\hat\rho: h_R \to F$, where $h_R$ is the functor representing the commutative ring $R$. The intuition here is that the functor of points $R \mapsto \text{Mor}(\text{Spec}(R),X)$ of a scheme $X$ is basically a way to separate out the various types of "points" of a scheme, with the notion of "point" depending on a specific ring. The geometric realization glues these points back together "in the most natural way".
Demazure and Gabriel show in detail that the functor taking a scheme to its functor of points is inverse to the functor taking a scheme functor to its geometric realization, up to isomorphism.
The trick is the second condition in the definition of a scheme-functor, which basically stipulates an open covering by affine schemes. To see this, note affine schemes correspond to representable functors on CRing. In other words, the scheme-functor corresponding to $\text{Spec}(R)$ is the functor
$$S \mapsto \text{Mor}_\text{Schemes}(\text{Spec}(S),\text{Spec}(R)) = \text{Mor}_{\text{CRing}^\text{op}}(S,R) = \text{Mor}_{\text{CRing}}(R,S) = h_R(S)$$
It is a good exercise to check the equivalence of categories between schemes and scheme-functors for affine schemes.