Sequence that converges in $L^{2}$ on the real line but nowhere pointwise

419 Views Asked by At

Give a sequence of functions $f_{n}:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ that converge in $L^{2}$ but pointwise nowhere.

I know that on bounded intervals such as $[0,1]$, the typical example of a sequence converging in $L^{2}$ but pointwise nowhere is the characteristic functions for intervals that get smaller eg. $f_{1} = 1_{[0,1]}, f_{2} = 1_{[0,\frac{1}{2})}, f_{3} = 1_{[\frac{1}{2},1]}, f_{4} = 1_{[0,\frac{1}{4})}...etc.$

How would one generalise this example to the real line or unbounded domains? I thought about doing this on each interval $[n,n+1)$ for $n\in\mathbb{Z}$, but since there are infinitely many of these, I can no longer be sure this converges in $L^{2}$.

1

There are 1 best solutions below

15
On BEST ANSWER

Note Of course an answer to the question is very simple. Lest anyone get the wrong idea about that from the slightly hairy nature of this post, I point out that there are three parts below: a one-line answer to the question, then an easy generalization using a big theorem, and finally an elementary proof of the big theorem:

Answer to the Question

Say $Q_n$ is a partition of $[-n,n)$ into $2n^2$ intervals, each of length $1/n$. Now combine all those intervals into a single sequence, by first listing all the intervals in $Q_1$, then all the intervals in $Q_2$, etc.

A Generalization

In fact you can do the same thing on any $\sigma$-finite non-atomic measure space:

Lemma. If $\mu$ is a non-atomic probability measure on $X$ then $X$ can be partitioned into $E_1\cup\dots\cup E_n$ where $\mu(E_j)=1/n$.

Proof: Someone's Theorem (proved below) says that if $\mu$ is non-atomic and $0<t<\mu(E)<\infty$ then there exists $F\subset E$ with $\mu(F)=t$. So we can find $E_1\subset X$ with $\mu(E_1)=1/n$, then $E_2\subset X\setminus E_1$ with $\mu(E_2)=1/n$, etc. (If there's a set of measure zero left over at the end then just add it to $E_1$.)

Cor. If $\mu$ is a finite non-atomic measure on $X$ then there exists $(f_n)\subset L^2$ with $||f_n||_2\to0$ but $f_n(x)\not\to0$ for every $x$.

Proof: Wlog $\mu(X)=1$; use the lemma to imitate the standard construction for $[0,1]$.

Cor. If $\mu$ is a $\sigma$-finite non-atomic measure on $X$ then there exists $(f_n)\subset L^2$ with $||f_n||_2\to0$ but $f_n(x)\not\to0$ for every $x$.

Proof: we get from finite to $\sigma$-finite using the same method as we use at the start to get from $[a,b]$ to $\Bbb R$.

And pleasantly

Exercise. If $\mu$ is a measure on $X$ and there exists $(f_n)\subset L^2$ with $||f_n||_2\to0$ but $f_n(x)\not\to0$ for every $x$ then $\mu$ is $\sigma$-finite and non-atomic.

The Big Theorem

Thinking about it, yesterday Someone's Theorem didn't seem quite as easy as I thought. Thanks to @Gabriel Romon for pointing out the proof here. The proof I gave yesterday involved transfinite recursion; the proofs at that link seem to use transfinite recursion or Zorn's lemma. Today we have a more elementary argument, involving neither:

Assume until further notice that $\mu$ is a non-atomic probability measure on $X$.

Lemma 1. If $\mu(E)>0$ then there exists $F\subset E$ with $0<\mu(F)\le\mu(E)/2$.

Proof: Since $\mu$ is non-atomic there exists $S\subset E$ with $0<\mu(S)<\mu(E)$. Now either $F=S$ or $F=E\setminus S$ works.

Cor. If $\mu(E)>0$ and $\epsilon>0$ there exists $F\subset E$ with $0<\mu(F)<\epsilon$.

Proof: $\lim_{n\to\infty}2^{-n}\mu(E)=0$.

Main Lemma. If $\mu(E)>0$ there exists $F\subset E$ with $\frac13\mu(E)\le\mu(F)\le\frac23\mu(E)$.

Proof. Suppose not: For every $F\subset E$ either $\mu(F)<\frac13\mu(E)$ or $\mu(F)>\frac23\mu(E)$. Let $$S=\{F\subset E:\mu(F)< \mu(E)/3\}$$ and $$s=\sup\{\mu(F):F\in S\}.$$

The key observation is that if $F_1,F_2\in S$ then $F_1\cup F_2\in S$; this is clear, since $\mu(F_1\cup F_2)<\frac23\mu(E)$, hence $\mu(F_1\cup F_2)<\frac13\mu(E)$.

Now there exist $A_n\in S$ with $\mu(A_n)\to s$. If $F_n=\bigcup_{k=1}^n A_k$ then $(F_n)\subset S$, $F_n\subset F_{n+1}$ and also $\mu(F_n)\ge\mu(A_n)$, so $\mu(F_n)\to s$. So if $F=\bigcup F_n$ then $$\mu(F)=s.\quad\text{(got it!)}$$

So we're done if we can show $s=\frac13\mu(E)$. Suppose otoh $\epsilon=\frac13\mu(E)-s>0$. Now there exists $A\subset E\setminus F$ with $0<\mu(A)<\epsilon$; hence $F\cup A\in S$ and $\mu(F\cup A)>s$, contradiction.

Main Corollary. If $E_1\subset E_2$ there exists $E_3$ with $E_1\subset E_3\subset E_2$ and $\mu(E_2)-\mu(E_3)\le\frac23(\mu(E_2)-\mu(E_1))$ and $\mu(E_3)-\mu(E_1)\le\frac23(\mu(E_2)-\mu(E_1))$.

Proof: Take $A\subset E_2\setminus E_1$ with $\frac13\mu(E_2\setminus E_1)\le\mu(A)\le\frac23\mu(E_2\setminus E_1))$; let $E_3=E_1\cup A$ and do the math.

(In fact, although we won't use this below, if we define $d(E,F)=\mu(E\Delta F)$ then for any two sets $E_1$ and $E_2$ there exists $E_3$ such that $d(E_1,E_3)\le\frac23 d(E_1,E_2)$ and $d(E_3,E_2)\le\frac23 d(E_1,E_2)$: Take $A\subset E_1\Delta E_2$ such that [etc] and let $E_3=(E_1\cap E_2)\cup A$.)

$\frac12$Theorem. $\{\mu(F):F\subset E\}$ is dense in $[0,\mu(E)]$.

Proof. Starting with $\emptyset\subset E$ and applying the Main Corollary repeatedly we obtain $\emptyset=E_0\subset\dots\subset E_n=E$ such that $\mu(E_{j+1})-\mu(E_j)<\epsilon$ for every $j$.

Theorem (Seirpinski). If $0<t<\mu(E)$ then there exists $F\subset E$ with $\mu(F)=t$.

Proof. We will construct a sequence of disjoint sets $E_n\subset E$ with $\sum\mu(E_n)=t$. Note that throughout the construction $F_n$ will denote the set $$F_n=\bigcup_{k=0}^n E_k.$$

Let $E_0=\emptyset$. Suppose $E_0,\dots,E_n$ have been chosen, such that $$\mu(F_n)<t.$$ Now $$0<t-\mu(F_n)<\mu(E)-\mu(F_n)=\mu(E\setminus F_n),$$so the $\frac12$theorem (with $E\setminus F_n$ in place of $E$) shows that there exists $E_{n+1}\subset E\setminus F_n$ with $$t-\mu(F_n)-\frac1n<\mu(E_{n+1})<t-\mu(F_n).$$Adding $\mu(F_n)$ to all three sides we obtain $t-\frac1n<\mu(F_{n+1})<t$. So if $F=\bigcup F_n$ then $\mu(F)=t$.

A Better Version

So that's the proof for a finite non-atomic measure. The result for an infinite non-atomic measure follows from this:

Lemma. If $\mu$ is an infinite non-atomic measure on $X$ then $\sup\{\mu(E):\mu(E)<\infty\}=\infty$.

Proof. This is exactly like the proof of the Main Lemma above. Suppose the sup is $\alpha<\infty$. Since the union of two sets of finite measure has finite measure it follows as before that there exist $E_n$ with $\mu(E_n)<\infty$, $E_n\subset E_{n+1}$ and $\mu(E_n)\to\alpha$; hence there exists $E$ with $\mu(E)=\alpha$. Now since $\mu$ is non-atomic there exists $A\subset X\setminus E$ with $0<\mu(A)<\infty$, and hence $\alpha<\mu(E\cup A)<\infty$, contradiction.