Let $\alpha$ be an ordinal. Consider the set $$S = \{ \operatorname{type}(\alpha, R) : R \text{ well orders } \alpha \}$$ Clearly $\alpha \in S$. Can anything be said about the relation of an arbitrary $\beta \in S$ to $\alpha$?
2026-03-26 13:00:48.1774530048
Set of well-orderings of a given ordinal
57 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in SET-THEORY
- Theorems in MK would imply theorems in ZFC
- What formula proved in MK or Godel Incompleteness theorem
- Proving the schema of separation from replacement
- Understanding the Axiom of Replacement
- Ordinals and cardinals in ETCS set axiomatic
- Minimal model over forcing iteration
- How can I prove that the collection of all (class-)function from a proper class A to a class B is empty?
- max of limit cardinals smaller than a successor cardinal bigger than $\aleph_\omega$
- Canonical choice of many elements not contained in a set
- Non-standard axioms + ZF and rest of math
Related Questions in ORDINALS
- Ordinals and cardinals in ETCS set axiomatic
- For each cardinal number $u$, there exists a smallest ordinal number $\alpha$ such that card$\alpha$ =$u$ .
- Intuition regarding: $\kappa^{+}=|\{\kappa\leq\alpha\lt \kappa^{+}\}|$
- Set membership as a relation on a particular set
- Goodstein's sequences and theorem.
- A proof of the simple pressing down lemma, is sup $x=x?$
- $COF(\lambda)$ is stationary in $k$, where $\lambda < k$ is regular.
- Difficulty in understanding cantor normal form
- What are $L_1$ and $L_2$ in the Gödel Constructible Hierarchy
- How many subsets are produced? (a transfinite induction argument)
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
$S$ has cardinality $\alpha^+$ and in fact $[\alpha, \alpha^+) \subseteq S \subseteq \alpha^+$.
To see this, let $\beta \in [\alpha, \alpha^+)$. Fix a bijection $$ f \colon \beta \to \alpha. $$ Define $R \subseteq \alpha \times \alpha$ via $$ R = \{ (f(i), f(j)) \mid i < j < \beta \}. $$ It's easy to see that $R$ is a wellorder of $\alpha$ and that $\mathrm{otp}(R) = \beta \in S$.
I'll leave it to you to prove that $S \subseteq \alpha^+$.
$\sup S$ is what is known as Hartogs' number (of $\alpha$). If $\alpha$ is an ordinal or can be wellordered, this is just the cardinal successor of $\alpha$.
In general, given any set $X$ (which may not have a wellorder), we let $$ H(X) := \sup \{ \alpha \in \mathrm{On} \mid \exists f \colon \alpha \to X \text{ injective} \}. $$ Let us define $S(X) := \{ \alpha \in \mathrm{On} \mid \exists f \colon \alpha \to X \text{ injective} \}$. If $\alpha \in S(X)$, witnessed by $f \colon \alpha \to X$, then we get a well-order $R$ of $\mathrm{img}(f)$ given by $$ R := \{ (f(i), f(j)) \mid i < j < \alpha \}. $$ Hence $S(X)$ consists of those ordertypes that are realizable as wellorders on (some subset of) $X$. In this sence, $S(X)$ is a generalization of the $S$ in your original post.