So I've run into an issue with simplifying the statement, with ω being the first infinite ordinal:
$(ω2)^ω$
Now in the case of a finite ordinal $a$ as an exponent, it is easy to inductively prove that
$(ω2)^a = (ω^a)2$
However, this is a little unclear as to what happens with the infinite exponent.
So which of the following would be true and why:
$(ω2)^ω = (ω^ω)2$
-or-
$(ω2)^ω = ω^ω$ ?
We could consider $(ω2)^ω$ as either
$ω(2ω)(2ω)...2$
(which in some way seems like nonsense as there is no "last" term) or as
$ω(2ω)(2ω)...$
The problem is that we are oscillating back and forth between $ω$ and $2$. Does this even have a clearly defined value?
HINT: I’m assuming that by $\omega2$ you mean the ordinal product $\omega\cdot 2=\omega+\omega$. For any ordinal $\alpha$, $\alpha^\omega=\sup_{n\in\omega}\alpha^n$, so you have
$$(\omega\cdot 2)^\omega=\sup_{n\in\omega}(\omega\cdot 2)^n=\sup_{n\in\omega}\left(\omega^n\cdot 2\right)\;.$$
Clearly $\omega^n<\omega^n\cdot 2<(\omega\cdot 2)^\omega$ for each $n\in\omega$, and $\sup_{n\in\omega}\omega^n=\omega^\omega$, so $\omega^\omega\le(\omega\cdot 2)^\omega$. Try to establish the opposite inequality as well, by considering how $\omega^n\cdot 2$ compares with $\omega^\omega$.