This is true, any idea how to say it in proof form?
I would guess:
In a poset with one maximal element, then that element has no other elements above it and has elements below it. If its the only one with no other elements above it, then it has to be the greatest element.
First, for the poset $P$, if $g \in P$ is the greatest element it implies that $g$ is related to every other element in $P$ (this is really the key, since in general a maximal element need not be related to every other element in $P$) since then for any other element $s \in P$ we must have $s \leq g$. So $s$ cannot be maximal. Then $g$ must be the only maximal element in $P$.