Consider some probabilistic events indicated by capital letters. Let $P$ stay for probability, $\perp$ for independence, $|$ for conditional. Suppose $$ (1) \text{ }A_1\perp B_1 | C \text{, i.e., $P(A_1,B_1|C)=P(A_1|C)\times P(B_1|C)$} $$ $$ (2) \text{ }A_2\perp B_2| C \text{, i.e., $P(A_2,B_2|C)=P(A_2|C)\times P(B_2|C)$} $$ $$ (3) \text{ }A_3\perp B_3| C \text{, i.e., $P(A_3,B_3|C)=P(A_3|C)\times P(B_3|C)$} $$ $$ (4) \text{ }A_1,A_2, A_3 \text{ mutually independent conditional on $C$, i.e.} $$ $$ P(A_1,A_2,A_3|C)=P(A_1|C)\times P(A_2|C)\times P(A_3|C) $$ $$ (5) \text{ }B_1,B_2,B_3 \text{ mutually independent conditional on $C$, i.e.,} $$ $$ P(B_1, B_2, B_3| C)=P(B_1| C)\times P(B_2| C)\times P(B_3| C) $$ Can we show that $$ A_1,A_2, A_3 \text{ mutually independent conditional on $B_1,B_2,B_3,C$, i.e. } $$ $$ P(A_1,A_2,A_3|B_1,B_2,B_3,C)=P(A_1|B_1,B_2,B_3,C)\times P(A_2|B_1,B_2,B_3,C)\times P(A_3|B_1,B_2,B_3,C) $$
2026-03-25 19:00:56.1774465256
Showing conditional mutual independence
159 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in PROBABILITY
- How to prove $\lim_{n \rightarrow\infty} e^{-n}\sum_{k=0}^{n}\frac{n^k}{k!} = \frac{1}{2}$?
- Is this a commonly known paradox?
- What's $P(A_1\cap A_2\cap A_3\cap A_4) $?
- Prove or disprove the following inequality
- Another application of the Central Limit Theorem
- Given is $2$ dimensional random variable $(X,Y)$ with table. Determine the correlation between $X$ and $Y$
- A random point $(a,b)$ is uniformly distributed in a unit square $K=[(u,v):0<u<1,0<v<1]$
- proving Kochen-Stone lemma...
- Solution Check. (Probability)
- Interpreting stationary distribution $P_{\infty}(X,V)$ of a random process
Related Questions in PROBABILITY-THEORY
- Is this a commonly known paradox?
- What's $P(A_1\cap A_2\cap A_3\cap A_4) $?
- Another application of the Central Limit Theorem
- proving Kochen-Stone lemma...
- Is there a contradiction in coin toss of expected / actual results?
- Sample each point with flipping coin, what is the average?
- Random variables coincide
- Reference request for a lemma on the expected value of Hermitian polynomials of Gaussian random variables.
- Determine the marginal distributions of $(T_1, T_2)$
- Convergence in distribution of a discretized random variable and generated sigma-algebras
Related Questions in INDEPENDENCE
- How to prove mutually independence?
- Simple example dependent variables but under some conditions independent
- Perturbing equivalent measures
- How to prove conditional independence properties
- How do I prove A and B are independent given C?
- Forming an orthonormal basis with these independent vectors
- Independence of stochastic processes
- joint probability density function for $ X = \sqrt(V) \cdot cos(\Phi) $ and $ Y = \sqrt(V) \cdot sin(\Phi) $
- How predictable is $Y$, given values of $X_i$s?
- Each vertex of the square has a value which is randomly chosen from a set.
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
No, we cannot show that since this is not true in general under this conditions. Let us provide counterexample.
Consider tossing fair coin twice and set $C=\Omega=\{HH, TT, HT, TH\}$. For this case conditional independence is the same as unconditional.
Define events $$A_1=\{HT,HH\},\, A_2=\{TH, HH\},\, B_1=\{TT, HH\}, \, B_2=A_3=B_3=\Omega.$$
Check that $A_1$, $A_2$ and $A_3$ are mutually independent, $B_1$, $B_2$ and $B_3$ are mutually independent.
Note that the equality $$\mathbb P(A_1\cap A_2\cap A_3)=\mathbb P(A_1)\mathbb P(A_2)\mathbb P(A_3)$$ is not sufficient in general for independence: for three events pairwise independence should also hold. The same is true for conditional independence, so the last phrase in your post does not define mutual conditional independence.
Next, $A_1$ and $B_1$ are independent since $$ \mathbb P(A_1\cap B_1)=\mathbb P(HH)=\frac14 = \mathbb P(A_1)\mathbb P(B_1) $$ $A_2$ and $B_2$ are independent too, as well as $A_3$ and $B_3$.
Calculate conditional probabilities: $$ \mathbb P(A_1\cap A_2\cap A_3\mid B_1\cap B_2\cap B_3) = \mathbb P(HH\mid HH \text{ or } TT) = \frac12, $$ $$ \mathbb P(A_1\mid B_1\cap B_2\cap B_3) = \mathbb P(HT \text{ or } HH\mid HH \text{ or } TT) = \frac12, $$ $$ \mathbb P(A_2\mid B_1\cap B_2\cap B_3) = \mathbb P(TH \text{ or } HH\mid HH \text{ or } TT) = \frac12, $$ $$ \mathbb P(A_3\mid B_1\cap B_2\cap B_3) = 1. $$ And $$\frac12\neq \frac12 \cdot \frac12 \cdot 1.$$