I want to show that $\lim_{x \to 2} x = 5$ is false.
Let $\epsilon > 0$. If this limit equivalence were true, we would need a $\delta$ such that $|x - 5| < \epsilon$ whenever $0 < |x-2| < \delta$.
$|x - 5| < \epsilon$ can be rewritten to $3-\epsilon < x - 2 < 3 + \epsilon$ or $|x-2| < \min(3 + \epsilon, \epsilon - 3) = \epsilon - 3$
However, we cannot set $\delta = \epsilon - 3$, since for $\epsilon \leq 3$, we have $\delta \leq 0$, which does not satisfy our original requirement that $0 < |x-2| < \delta$.
By contradiction suppose that
$$\lim_{x \to 2} x = 5$$
then by definition of limit we have that $\forall \epsilon>0$ $\exists\delta>0$ such that $\forall x$
$$0<|x-2|<\delta \implies |x-5|<\epsilon$$
but for $ \epsilon=1$
$$|x-5|<1\iff 4<x<6$$
and for $\delta<1$
$$|x-2|<1\iff 1<x<3$$
then
$$\lim_{x \to 2} x \neq 5$$
Note that from the logical point of view since the definition is
$$\left(\lim_{x\rightarrow a} f(x) = L\right) \iff \Big(\forall \varepsilon >0\, \exists \delta > 0: \big(0<\vert x-a\vert <\delta \implies \vert f(x)-L\vert <\varepsilon\big)\Big)$$
the negation is
$$\left(\lim_{x\rightarrow a} f(x) \neq L\right) \iff \Big(\exists \varepsilon >0\, \forall \delta > 0: \big(0<\vert x-a\vert <\delta \not\Rightarrow \vert f(x)-L\vert <\varepsilon\big)\Big).$$