My reasoning is just that the inner products on $C[0,2]$ are defined to be the integrals from $0$ to $2$… and the one in the problem is from $0$ to $1$, so it can’t be an inner product based on that. Is this reasoning too simplistic or even incorrect? I don’t see any other way to show that it’s not an inner product on $C[0,2]$.
2026-05-05 05:52:38.1777960358
Showing that $\int_{0}^{1} f\, \overline{g} \,dx$ isn't an inner product on $C[0,2]$.
130 Views Asked by user1151269 https://math.techqa.club/user/user1151269/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LINEAR-ALGEBRA
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- Alternate basis for a subspace of $\mathcal P_3(\mathbb R)$?
- Why the derivative of $T(\gamma(s))$ is $T$ if this composition is not a linear transformation?
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Summation in subsets
- $C=AB-BA$. If $CA=AC$, then $C$ is not invertible.
- Basis of span in $R^4$
- Prove if A is regular skew symmetric, I+A is regular (with obstacles)
- Dimension of solution space of homogeneous differential equation, proof
Related Questions in SOLUTION-VERIFICATION
- Linear transform of jointly distributed exponential random variables, how to identify domain?
- Exercise 7.19 from Papa Rudin: Gathering solutions
- Proof verification: $\forall n \in \mathbb{Z}, 4\nmid(n^2+2)$
- Proof verification: a function with finitely many points of discontinuity is Riemann integrable
- Do Monoid Homomorphisms preserve the identity?
- Cantor-Lebesgue's theorem
- If $a$ is an integer, prove that $\gcd(14a + 3, 21a + 4) = 1$.
- Number theory gcd
- $|G| > 1$ and not prime implies existence of a subgroup other than two trivial subgroups
- Prove/Disprove: Sum of im/ker of linear transformation contained in ker/im of each linear trasnfromation
Related Questions in PROOF-WRITING
- how is my proof on equinumerous sets
- Do these special substring sets form a matroid?
- How do I prove this question involving primes?
- Total number of nodes in a full k-ary tree. Explanation
- Prove all limit points of $[a,b]$ are in $[a,b]$
- $\inf A = -\sup (-A)$
- Prove that $\sup(cA)=c\sup(A)$.
- Supremum of Sumset (Proof Writing)
- Fibonacci Numbers Proof by Induction (Looking for Feedback)
- Is my method correct for to prove $a^{\log_b c} = c^{\log_b a}$?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Your reasoning boils down to the following argument: "The inner products on function spaces I've seen are of the form X. This is not of the form X, so it is not an inner product on a function space."
Generalizing, you are essentially saying: "I'm used to <type of object> looking like X. So all <type of object>s must look like X".
This kind of reasoning is called inductive, and it is essential for the sciences, where the rules of our universe are carved in stone, but we don't know them and we try to find or at least approximate those rules by making many observations and then assuming that what was true for all of our observations until now will probably be true in general.
This is not how reasoning in math works. Mathematical reasoning is generally deductive, that is, we know the rules because we set them ourselves, and now we want to find out what we can do with those rules.
That is, in maths you have to work with the rules that we set ourselves. In this case the rules are: Inner products are sesquilinear, symmetric and positive definite. You have to appeal to these rules, not your previous experiences. Your previous experiences may inform you about how to work with the rules, but you can't appeal to them when making your final argument.
Here specifically, it is a basic exercise to prove that the given operation is not positive definite: Try to find a nonzero functions $f$ such that $\int_0^1f(x)\bar f(x)\mathrm dx=0$. Use the fact that the integral from 0 to 1 doesn't depend on how the function behaves on $(1,2)$.