Why $$(1-z)^{1+a}~_2F_1(1+(m+1)a, 2+a; 2+(m+1)a;z)$$ can be simplified to $$_2F_1(1, ma, 2+(m+1)a;z)$$ ?
The above step comes from: https://arxiv.org/pdf/cond-mat/0004434.pdf
Thanks.
Why $$(1-z)^{1+a}~_2F_1(1+(m+1)a, 2+a; 2+(m+1)a;z)$$ can be simplified to $$_2F_1(1, ma, 2+(m+1)a;z)$$ ?
The above step comes from: https://arxiv.org/pdf/cond-mat/0004434.pdf
Thanks.
It's the Eluler transformation for the hypergeometric function: $${}_{2}F_{1}(\alpha,\beta;\gamma;z)=(1-z)^{\gamma-\alpha-\beta}\,{}_{2}F_{1}(\gamma-\alpha,\gamma-\beta;\gamma;z)$$
The proof consists of writing the Euler integral for the hypergeometric function and changing the variable unders the integral according to:
$$t=\frac{1-y}{1-zy}$$
The Euler integral is:
$${_2 F_1} (\alpha,\beta;\gamma;z)=\frac{1}{B(\beta,\gamma-\beta)} \int_0^1 t^{\beta-1} (1-t)^{\gamma-\beta-1} (1- zt)^{-\alpha} dt$$
By direct substitution with:
$$dt=-\frac{1-z}{(1-zy)^2}dy$$
$$1-t=\frac{(1-z)y}{1-zy}$$
$$1-zt=\frac{1-z}{1-zy}$$
We can confirm the transformation.