Given $f(z):=\operatorname{Log}(\frac{z-2}{z-3})$, $\operatorname{Log}:\mathbb{C}\setminus\mathbb{R_{\le 0}}\to \mathbb{C}$. Is in $z_0=3$ a essential singularity of f? I'm not sure what is correct... In my opinion $z_0$ is not isolated, there is no neighborhood $X=U\setminus \{3\}$ at 3 such that f is holomorphic on X. Therefore the residue of f at 3 has to be zero. But nevertheless, I calculated first: $$\operatorname{Log}(\frac{z-2}{z-3})=\operatorname{Log}(1+\frac{1}{z-3})=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}(-1)^{n+1}\frac{1}{(z-3)^n*n}=\sum_{n=-\infty}^{-1}(-1)^{-n+1}\frac{(z-3)^n}{-n}$$ and I got $z_0=3$ is a essential singularity of f with $\operatorname{Res}(f,3)=-1$. Now I'm confused. Is it wrong to say that the coefficient of $z^{-1}$ is the residuum of f in 3 because in 3 f has no isolated singularity? Regards.
2026-03-28 15:18:57.1774711137
Singularities of a function
86 Views Asked by user151465 https://math.techqa.club/user/user151465/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in COMPLEX-ANALYSIS
- Minkowski functional of balanced domain with smooth boundary
- limit points at infinity
- conformal mapping and rational function
- orientation of circle in complex plane
- If $u+v = \frac{2 \sin 2x}{e^{2y}+e^{-2y}-2 \cos 2x}$ then find corresponding analytical function $f(z)=u+iv$
- Is there a trigonometric identity that implies the Riemann Hypothesis?
- order of zero of modular form from it's expansion at infinity
- How to get to $\frac{1}{2\pi i} \oint_C \frac{f'(z)}{f(z)} \, dz =n_0-n_p$ from Cauchy's residue theorem?
- If $g(z)$ is analytic function, and $g(z)=O(|z|)$ and g(z) is never zero then show that g(z) is constant.
- Radius of convergence of Taylor series of a function of real variable
Related Questions in FUNCTIONS
- Functions - confusion regarding properties, as per example in wiki
- Composition of functions - properties
- Finding Range from Domain
- Why is surjectivity defined using $\exists$ rather than $\exists !$
- What are the functions satisfying $f\left(2\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{3^i}\right)=\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{2^i}$
- Lower bound of bounded functions.
- Does there exist any relationship between non-constant $N$-Exhaustible function and differentiability?
- Given a function, prove that it's injective
- Surjective function proof
- How to find image of a function
Related Questions in RESIDUE-CALCULUS
- How to get to $\frac{1}{2\pi i} \oint_C \frac{f'(z)}{f(z)} \, dz =n_0-n_p$ from Cauchy's residue theorem?
- contour integral involving the Gamma function
- The Cauchy transform of Marchenko-Pastur law
- Contour Integration with $\sec{(\sqrt{1-x^2})}$
- calculate $\int_{-\infty}^\infty\frac{e^{ix} \, dx}{x^3-3ix^2+2x+2i}$
- Integral $\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac{ \exp\left( i a e^{u}\right) }{ e^{b \cosh(u)} - 1 } du$
- Solve the improper integral with techniques of complex analysis
- Compute the integral with use of complex analysis techniques
- $\int\limits_{-\infty}^\infty \frac{1}{e^{x^{2}}+1}dx$
- Residue Theorem: Inside vs. Outside
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
That depends on what you call an essential singularity. If you call only isolated singularities that are neither removable nor poles essential singularities, then $3$ is not an essential singularity of $f$, since it's not an isolated singularity, you have the branch cut from $2$ to $3$. If you call every singularity that is neither removable nor a pole essential, isolated or not, then $3$ is an essential singularity of $f$.
No, it is not defined. The residue is only defined in isolated singularities.
Since $f$ is not holomorphic in a punctured neighbourhood of $3$, $f$ has no Laurent expansion in such a punctured neighbourhood. The Laurent expansion you computed is valid in the annulus $1 < \lvert z-3\rvert < \infty$, not in a punctured neighbourhood of $3$, and from such an expansion, you cannot read off a residue even if there was an isolated singularity in $3$. Consider for illustration $g(z) = \frac{1}{z(1-z)} = \frac{1}{z} + \frac{1}{1-z}$. $g$ has an isolated singularity in $0$, with residue $1$, but the Laurent expansion of $g$ in the annulus $1 < \lvert z\rvert < \infty$ is
$$\begin{align} g(z) &= \frac{1}{z} + \frac{1}{1-z}\\ &= \frac{1}{z} - \frac{1}{z}\cdot \frac{1}{1-\frac{1}{z}}\\ &= \frac{1}{z}\left(1-\sum_{k=0}^\infty \frac{1}{z^k}\right)\\ &= - \sum_{m=2}^\infty \frac{1}{z^m}, \end{align}$$
which has $0$ as the coefficient of $z^{-1}$.