I'm reading Optimal Transport for Applied Mathematicians by Fillipo Santambrogio. At one point he says that taking the convolution of a measure with a smooth mollifier, i.e $\eta_\varepsilon \in C^\infty_c (X)$ such that $$ \int_{\mathbb{R}^d} \eta_\varepsilon = 1$$ then considering $$ \mu * \eta_\varepsilon $$ we obtain an absolutely continuous (with respect to the d dimensional lebesgue measure) smoothing of $\mu$. However, I am somewhat struggling to understand how this is the case. For example, if I consider the dirac measure $\delta_0$ at 0 on $\mathbb{R}$, then take $\eta_\varepsilon * \delta_0$, I should have $$ \eta_\varepsilon * \delta_0 (\{0\}) = \int_{\{0\}} 1 d\eta_\varepsilon * \delta_0 = \int_{\{0\}} 1 * \eta_\varepsilon d(\delta_0) = \int_{\{0\}} \left( \int_\mathbb{R} 1 \cdot \eta_\varepsilon(z) dz \right) d(\delta_0) = \int_{\{0\}} 1 d(\delta_0) = 1$$ which would seem to imply that $\delta_0 * \eta_\varepsilon$ gives mass to a set of lebesgue measure zero, which obviously means it cannot be absolutely continuous. What am I missing here?
2026-02-23 10:13:39.1771841619
Smoothing measure by convolution
261 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in MEASURE-THEORY
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Absolutely continuous functions are dense in $L^1$
- I can't undestand why $ \{x \in X : f(x) > g(x) \} = \bigcup_{r \in \mathbb{Q}}{\{x\in X : f(x) > r\}\cap\{x\in X:g(x) < r\}} $
- Trace $\sigma$-algebra of a product $\sigma$-algebra is product $\sigma$-algebra of the trace $\sigma$-algebras
- Meaning of a double integral
- Random variables coincide
- Convergence in measure preserves measurability
- Convergence in distribution of a discretized random variable and generated sigma-algebras
- A sequence of absolutely continuous functions whose derivatives converge to $0$ a.e
- $f\in L_{p_1}\cap L_{p_2}$ implies $f\in L_{p}$ for all $p\in (p_1,p_2)$
Related Questions in CONVOLUTION
- What is the result of $x(at) * δ(t-k)$
- Convolution sum
- PDF of the sum of two random variables integrates to >1
- If $u \in \mathscr{L}^1(\lambda^n), v\in \mathscr{L}^\infty (\lambda^n)$, then $u \star v$ is bounded and continuous.
- Proof of Young's inequality $\Vert u \star v \Vert_p \le \Vert u \Vert_1 \Vert v \Vert_p.$
- Duhamel's principle for heat equation.
- Computing the convolution of $f(x)=\gamma1_{(\alpha,\alpha+\beta)}(x)$
- Convolution of distributions property
- Self-convolution of $f(\vec{r}) = e^{-x^2-y^2}/r^2$
- Inverse $z$-transform similar to convolution
Related Questions in OPTIMAL-TRANSPORT
- Lipschitz extension of affine function to whole space
- Closed-form analytical solutions to Optimal Transport/Wasserstein distance
- Monge and Kantorovich problem in optimal transport
- The Lebesgue measure as energy minimizer?
- Measurable selection of geodesics
- Choquet's and Birkhoff's theorem for min-max discrete optimization problems
- What was wrong with this argument?
- Example of a Minimum Cost Capacitated Flow Problem
- Negative cost coefficients in Transportation problem
- optimization loss due to misperceived probability
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Since $\delta_0$ is the neutral element for convolution, you have $\eta_{\epsilon}\star \delta_0=\eta_{\epsilon}$ which is smooth. Your computation went wrong, you should have written, since $\delta_0$ is a distribution, $$(\delta_0\star\eta_{\epsilon})(x)=\left<\delta_0,\eta_\epsilon(x-\cdot)\right>=\eta_\epsilon(x-0)=\eta_\epsilon(x).$$