My attempt:
3x≡1 mod 7 (1)
4x≡1 mod 9 (2)
Multiply (1) by 5
Multiply (2) by 7
x≡5 mod 7
x≡7 mod 9
So x≡9k+7
9k+7=5(mod7)
k=5(mod7)
k=7j+5
x=9(7j+5)+7
=63j+52
x≡52(mod63)
My attempt:
3x≡1 mod 7 (1)
4x≡1 mod 9 (2)
Multiply (1) by 5
Multiply (2) by 7
x≡5 mod 7
x≡7 mod 9
So x≡9k+7
9k+7=5(mod7)
k=5(mod7)
k=7j+5
x=9(7j+5)+7
=63j+52
x≡52(mod63)
From the first equation (note that $5$ is the multplicative inverse of $3 \pmod 5$),
$3(5)x \equiv 5 \pmod 7 \implies 15x \equiv 5 \pmod 7 \implies x \equiv 5 \pmod 7$. So $x = 7k + 5$
Substitute into the second to give $28k + 20 \equiv 1 \pmod 9 \implies k \equiv -19\pmod 9 \implies k \equiv -1 \pmod 9$. So $k = 9t -1$
So $x = 7(9t-1) + 5 = 63t -2$, giving the solution $x \equiv -2 \equiv 61 \pmod {63}$.
In asker's question, the error is here:
Going from "9k+7=5(mod7)"
to "k=5(mod7)"
is unjustifiable. From the first, we get $9k \equiv -2 \pmod 7$ or $2k \equiv -2 \pmod 7$. That gives $k \equiv -1 \equiv 6 \pmod 7$.
It is also equally unclear how "So x≡9k+7" became "x=9(k)+5" later on. The latter should be $x = 9(k) + 7$.
Correcting for those two errors gives the expected solution (identical to mine).