Solve the following trigonometric eqation where $\alpha, \beta, \gamma$ are angles in a triangle ($\alpha + \beta + \gamma = 180$):
$$\sin \frac{\alpha - \beta}2 + \sin \frac{\alpha - \gamma}2 + \sin \frac{3\alpha}2 =\frac 3 2$$
Transforming it into $2 \sin \frac{3\alpha-180}4 \cos \frac{\beta - \gamma}4 + \sin \frac{3\alpha}2 =\frac{3}2$ and $\cos \frac{\beta - \gamma}4 =\cos \frac{180- \alpha}4 + 2 \sin \frac{\beta}4 \sin \frac{\gamma}4$ is as far as I came.
I took an approach which may be only superficially different from abel's because of the underlying trig identities and follows a lead SoulEater was taking, but along a slightly different path.
We can get rid of $ \ \alpha \ $ , to start off, by writing $ \ \alpha - \beta \ = \ \pi - 2 \beta - \gamma \ $ and, similarly, $ \ \alpha - \gamma \ = \ \pi - \beta - 2\gamma \ $ . From this, we have
$$ \sin \left( \frac{\alpha - \beta}{2} \right) \ = \ \sin \left( \frac{\pi}{2} - [ \ \beta + \frac{\gamma}{2} \ ] \right) \ = \ \cos \left( \ \beta + \frac{\gamma}{2} \ \right) \ \ $$
and $ \ \sin \left( \frac{\alpha - \gamma}{2} \right) \ = \ \cos \left( \ \frac{\beta}{2} + \gamma \ \right) \ $ . [So far, this looks like what abel did, while deriving the variable transformations.] We will also write
$$ \sin \frac{3 \alpha}{2} \ = \ \sin \left( \frac{3}{2} [ \pi - \beta - \gamma ] \right) \ = \ \sin \left( \frac{3 \pi}{2} - \ \frac{3}{2} [\beta + \gamma ] \ \right) \ = \ -\cos \left( \frac{3}{2} [\beta + \gamma ] \ \right) \ \ . $$
The original equation is now
$$ \cos \left( \ \beta + \frac{\gamma}{2} \ \right) \ + \ \cos \left( \ \frac{\beta}{2} + \gamma \ \right) \ - \ \cos \left( \frac{3}{2} [\beta + \gamma ] \ \right) \ = \ \frac{3}{2} \ \ . $$
Applying a "sum-to-product rule" on the first two terms here gives
$$ 2 \ \cos \left( \frac{3}{4} [\beta + \gamma ] \ \right) \cos \left( \frac{1}{4} [\beta - \gamma ] \right) - \ \cos \left( \frac{3}{2} [\beta + \gamma ] \ \right) \ = \ \frac{3}{2} \ \ . $$
This seemingly doesn't appear to have done much of anything useful, but it turns out we've actually finished the "hard part"...
We will label the angles $ \ \Theta \ = \ \frac{3}{4} [\beta + \gamma ] \ $ and $ \ \Phi \ = \ \frac{1}{4} [\beta - \gamma ] \ $ , allowing us to write
$$ 2 \ \cos \Theta \ \cos \Phi \ - \ \cos \ ( 2 \Theta ) \ = \ \frac{3}{2} \ \ \Rightarrow \ \ 2 \ \cos \Theta \ \cos \Phi \ - \ 2 \ \cos^2 \Theta \ + \ 1 \ = \ \frac{3}{2} $$
$$ \Rightarrow \ \ \cos \Theta \ \cos \Phi \ - \ \cos^2 \Theta \ = \ \frac{1}{4} \ \ . $$
Now, if $ \ \beta \ = \ \gamma \ $ , then $ \ \Phi \ = \ 0 \ $ and we just have the quadratic equation in $ \ \cos \Theta \ $ ,
$$ \cos^2 \Theta \ - \ \cos \Theta \ + \ \frac{1}{4} \ = \ \left( \cos \Theta \ - \ \frac{1}{2} \right)^2 \ = \ 0 \ \ . $$
Since we are limiting ourselves to angles of a triangle, we obtain
$$ \cos \left( \frac{3}{4} [\beta + \gamma ] \ \right) \ = \ \frac{1}{2} \ \ \Rightarrow \ \ \frac{3}{4} [\beta + \gamma ] \ = \ \frac{\pi}{3} \ \ \Rightarrow \ \ \beta \ + \ \gamma \ = \ \frac{4 \pi}{9} \ \ . $$
Thus, $ \ \beta \ = \ \gamma \ = \ \frac{2 \pi}{9} \ \ \Rightarrow \ \ \alpha \ = \ \frac{5 \pi}{9} \ $ .
Are other solutions permissible? If we allow $ \ \beta \ \neq \ \gamma \ $ and call $ \ \cos \Phi \ = \ \varphi \ $ , our quadratic equation becomes $ \ \cos^2 \Theta \ - \ \varphi \ \cos \Theta \ + \ \frac{1}{4} = \ 0 \ $ , which has potential solutions
$$ \cos \Theta \ = \ \frac{\varphi \ \pm \ \sqrt{ \ \varphi^2 \ - \ 1 } } {2} \ \ . $$
But real solutions for $ \ \cos \Theta \ $ would only be possible here for $ \ \varphi \ = \ \cos \Phi \ \ge \ 1 \ $ . So the only solution for our original equation is the one we've already found with $ \ \varphi \ = \ 1 \ $ or $ \ \beta \ = \ \gamma \ $ .