Its easy to find focus of standard parabolas but how to find directrix,focus,vertex etc. of oblique parabolas(Whose axis is not parallel to x or y axis).Any help:)
2026-03-26 21:35:24.1774560924
Specific method for finding focus of oblique parabolas?
2.3k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in GEOMETRY
- Point in, on or out of a circle
- Find all the triangles $ABC$ for which the perpendicular line to AB halves a line segment
- How to see line bundle on $\mathbb P^1$ intuitively?
- An underdetermined system derived for rotated coordinate system
- Asymptotes of hyperbola
- Finding the range of product of two distances.
- Constrain coordinates of a point into a circle
- Position of point with respect to hyperbola
- Length of Shadow from a lamp?
- Show that the asymptotes of an hyperbola are its tangents at infinity points
Related Questions in CONIC-SECTIONS
- Show that the asymptotes of an hyperbola are its tangents at infinity points
- Do projective transforms preserve circle centres?
- A Problem Based on Ellipse
- Perfect Pascal Mysticum Points
- I need to rotate this parabola around the y axis, but can't find the correct expression
- Prove that the common chord passes through the origin.
- Rotated ellipse tangent to circle
- tangent to two different branches of the hyperbola
- Probability that a triangle inscribed in an ellipse contains one of its foci
- Locus of mid point of intercepts of tangents to a ellipse
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
If you could find the vertex and axis direction of the parabola, you could then proceed in several ways to compute all of those other properties of it.
The general conic equation $Ax^2+2Bxy+Cy^2+2Dx+2Ey+F=0$ represents a parabola if the discriminant $B^2-AC=0$. This condition means that the quadratic part $Ax^2+2Bxy+Cy^2$ is a perfect square, which we can write as $(\alpha x+\beta y)^2$.
On the other hand, if the line $ax+by+c=0$ is a parabola’s axis and its tangent at the vertex is $bx-ax+d=0$, then an equation of the parabola is $$(ax+by+c)^2=4p(bx-ay+d).\tag{*}$$ If the coefficients of the two affine terms are normalized so that $a^2+b^2=1$, this is simply a rotated and translated version of the standard equation $y^2=4px$. I assume that you know how to extract the information that you’re interested in from that.
Comparing these two equations of the parabola, we see that we can find the direction of the parabola’s axis from the general conic equation by factoring the quadratic part. The vertex is the point at which the normal to the parabola is parallel to its axis. Writing the parabola’s equation as $f(x,y)=0$, this condition can be formulated as $$\det\begin{bmatrix} \beta & f_x(x,y) \\ -\alpha & f_y(x,y) \end{bmatrix} = \alpha f_x(x,y) + \beta f_y(x,y) = 0.$$ It turns out that this linear equation is in fact an equation of the parabola’s axis. With this equation in hand, you can rearrange the general conic equation into the form (*). The vertex of the parabola is the intersection of the axis and vertex tangent (or axis and parabola), which is easily found to be $$\left(-{ac+bd\over a^2+b^2},{ad-bc\over a^2+b^2}\right).$$
Alternatively, you can write the general equation in homogeneous matrix form $\mathbf x^TQ\mathbf x=0$. A parabola is tangent to the line at infinity and the point of tangency is the intersection of its axis and the line at infinity (i.e., the direction of the axis). This point is the pole of the line at infinity, which you can compute as $Q^{-1}(0,0,1)^T$, i.e., the last row or column of $Q^{-1}$, and will have the form $\mathbf p = (b,-a,0)^T$. The tangent at the vertex is then $\mathbf l = (b,-a, \tau)^T$ for some $\tau$, which you can find by solving the dual conic equation $\mathbf l^TQ^{-1}\mathbf l=0$ for $\tau$. The vertex is just the pole of this line, $\mathbf v = Q^{-1}\mathbf l$, and the axis is $\mathbf v\times\mathbf p$.