In Atiyah and Macdonald chapter 1, it is an exercise to prove the following:
Let $X$ be a compact Hausdorff space. Let $C(X)$ be the commutative ring of $\mathbb{R}$-valued continuous functions on $X$. Then $\operatorname{Max}(C(X))$, the subspace of $\operatorname{Spec}(C(X))$ consisting of maximal ideals, is homeomorphic to $X$.
An important step in this proof is demonstrating that every maximal ideal of $C(X)$ is of the form $\left\{f \in C(X) : f(x) = 0\right\}$ for some $x\in X$. I understand the proof, but I am struggling to assign geometric intuition to $C(X)$. (Ideally I would prefer to visualize the associated topological spaces in the context of a familiar manifold like $S_n$.)
What does $\operatorname{Spec}(C(X))$ look like? I'm not sure how to approach this question, but my conjecture is that it's not that much different from $\operatorname{Max}(C(X))$. This is my reasoning:
- A prime ideal of $C(X)$ should probably be identified by its zeros on $X$. I'm not sure how to prove this exactly, but it seems to me that requiring zeros is the only way to ensure that the a subset of $C(X)$ is closed as a $C(X)$-module.
- If you cut out an ideal $\mathfrak{a} \subsetneq C(X)$ by $\left\{f\in C(X) : f(x) = 0 \ \forall x\in Z\right\}$, $Z \subseteq X$; $\mathfrak{a}$ cannot possibly be prime if $Z$ is finite. (The product of two functions with one zero can have two zeros.)
- As above, if $Z$ is infinite, it seems that $\mathfrak{a}$ is in fact prime.
So I suspect that $\operatorname{Spec}(C(X))$ is, as a poset, isomorphic to $\left\{A \in \mathscr{P}(X) : A \ \text{infinite}\right\}$. Am I on the right track?
Any geometric/topological insights?
The prime spectrum is very similar to the maximal spectrum, but not quite in the way you imagine. For any $x \in X$, let $M_x$ denote the (maximal) ideal of all functions that vanish at $x$ and $O_x$ the ideal of all functions that vanish on a neighbourhood of $x$. Since $X$ is compact, there is for any prime ideal $P$ an $x$ such that $P \subset M_x$. It is easy to show that $P$ in turn must contain $O_x$. (Use Urysohn's lemma to show that if $f$ vanishes on a neighbourhood of $x$, there is a function $g$ such that $fg = 0$ and $g \notin M_x$)
It is also not hard to see that $O_x \not\subset M_y$ unless $x = y$, so any prime ideal $P$ is contained in a unique maximal ideal $\mu(P)$. It can be shown that the mapping $\mu: \operatorname{Spec} C(X) \to \operatorname{Max} C(X)$ is in fact a strong deformation retraction.
Much more information can be found in Gillman & Jerison, Rings of continuous functions, especially chapter 14, and in