Squaring Circle (im)Possibilities?

66 Views Asked by At

It is well-known, that it's impossible to square a circle. There are good papers on the matter and good videos, like from Mathologer or Numberphile

So, if rules of the game are that we have a

  • Ruler (NOT a measured one) for straight lines
  • Compass for circles

it's proven to be an impossibility. I'm not a professional mathematician but I'm able to understand the material (I think) well.

My question is:

What is the "minimal" change in the rules of the game so that we can square a circle?

I put "minimal" into quotation marks because, while this is bugging me, I fail to come up with a proper definition of "minimal". I.e. I have no clear way of comparing one change of rules of the game with another to clearly answer which one does "fewer changes" to the rules of the game. But I still am curious about what could be possible answers to the question bearing in mind this "handwave-y" definition.

EDIT: (Bonus) if the construction process with the changed rules is the one we can reproduce in real life. For example, adding a new tool to the tool set and/or allowing other operations with tools.

2

There are 2 best solutions below

16
On

As I noted in my comment, there are no really pretty ways to make squaring the circle possible. However, the following is as close as I imagine one can get to a loosening of rules to allow squaring the circle.

The new rule is to allow for infinite sums. For each $n\in\mathbb N$, we construct a segment of length $n^2$, and then one of length $\frac1{n^2}$ via this construction. Then, we line up all of these segments to construct a new segment of length $x$. Finally, we construct a segment with length $6x$, and then construct a segment of length $\sqrt[4]{6x}$ by repeating this construction. Finally, construct $\frac1{\sqrt[4]{6x}}$ by applying this construction.

Note that $\frac1{\sqrt[4]{6x}}=\frac1{\sqrt\pi}$, so a circle with radius $\frac1{\sqrt[4]{6x}}$ has area $1$, the same as that of the unit square.

0
On

This is a comment.

It has been shown that the unmarked straight-edge is redundant. Starting with 2 points in a plane, any point that can be constructed with drawing compass & straight-edge can be found with the compass alone.

Also if we are given a single circle and its center and one other point, we can drop the compass and use only the straight-edge and still construct every point that can be reached by edge+compass. Note that we do NOT assume all points on that given circle are constructed. The only constructible points on it are the intersections of it with lines through pairs of (previously) constructed points.

I am sorry I cannot recall references for these. I believe they are from the 1700's.

BTW in an earlier era, what we call a compass was called "compasses".