The textbook by Kreyszig on functional analysis identifies three steps to verify the completeness of a space:
- Construct an element to use as a limit: $x$
- Prove that $x$ is in the space considered
- Prove that $x_n \rightarrow x$ (in the sense of metric)
I'm confused by these steps. In particular, if we stop at step 2, aren't we done? If $x$ is a limit point in a metric space (in fact a normed space here), aren't we gauranteed that a sequence hits it? (Take balls of radius $1/n$)
Completeness means every Cauchy sequence converges. More precisely, every sequence $(x_n)$ satisfying $\|x_n-x_m\| \rightarrow 0$ as $n,m\rightarrow \infty$, converges$^3$, to some point$^1$, in the space$^2$. You need point 3 because of the definition of convergence in metric spaces.
What if you took the sequence $1/n$ in $[0,1]$? I could construct the candidate limit "1". I could show that 1 belongs to the space. But I couldn't show convergence of the sequence to 1.