Let $\psi$ be a smooth function on a two dimensional simply connected domain $\Omega$ such that $\psi=0$ on the boundary $\partial \Omega$. Suppose $\rho$ is not a critical value of $\psi$ then it is claimed that the level set $\psi= \rho$ consists of finitely many closed disjoint curves. How does one prove / see this? Also, if we were working on the two torus rather than a simply connected domain would this still be true?
2026-03-27 00:05:01.1774569901
Structure of level sets of a noncritical point of a smooth function on a two dimensional domain
390 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in DIFFERENTIAL-GEOMETRY
- Smooth Principal Bundle from continuous transition functions?
- Compute Thom and Euler class
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- Alternative definition for characteristic foliation of a surface
- Studying regular space curves when restricted to two differentiable functions
- What kind of curvature does a cylinder have?
- A new type of curvature multivector for surfaces?
- Regular surfaces with boundary and $C^1$ domains
- Show that two isometries induce the same linear mapping
- geodesic of infinite length without self-intersections
Related Questions in DIFFERENTIAL-TOPOLOGY
- Getting a self-homeomorphism of the cylinder from a self-homeomorphism of the circle
- what is Sierpiński topology?
- Bott and Tu exercise 6.5 - Reducing the structure group of a vector bundle to $O(n)$
- The regularity of intersection of a minimal surface and a surface of positive mean curvature?
- What's the regularity of the level set of a ''semi-nondegenerate" smooth function on closed manifold?
- Help me to prove related path component and open ball
- Poincarè duals in complex projective space and homotopy
- Hyperboloid is a manifold
- The graph of a smooth map is a manifold
- Prove that the sets in $\mathbb{R}^n$ which are both open and closed are $\emptyset$ and $\mathbb{R}^n$
Related Questions in FLUID-DYNAMICS
- How to prove a Minimal Surface minimizes Surface Tension
- Confusion about vector tensor dot product
- Stationary Condition of Variational Iteration Method
- Partial derivatives and path integrals
- Complex potentials and gradient
- 1D viscous flow upwards against gravity
- Higher order of the convection term approximation
- Show that using Suffix Notation
- Fluid Dynamics Proof
- Conversion of Surface integral to a suitable Volume integral.
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
With the above assumptions, the statement is true, and you don't even need $\Omega$ to be simply connected. Indeed, let $M=\{(x,y)\in \Omega:\psi(x,y)=\rho\}$. This set is closed in $\Omega$ and has no limit points on $\partial \Omega$. Therefore, $M$ is compact. Since $\nabla \psi\ne 0$ on $M$, the implicit function theorem implies that $M$ is a $1$-dimensional manifold (not necessarily connected). A $1$-manifold can be covered by open sets each of which is homeomorphic to a line interval. By compactness, finitely many such sets are enough. It follows that $M$ has finitely many connected component. Each component is homeomorphic to $S^1$ by the classification of $1$-manifolds.
The above works just as well when $\Omega$ is a bounded open subset of a $2$-dimensional manifold (torus, etc.)