I have been given the polynomial $$\epsilon x^3+x-2=0,$$ where epsilon is very small and I need to find the roots using perturbation theory. So far I have found the first root, 2, using the direct method and then have rescaled the x value with a new variable $x= \bar x \delta$ in order to find the other two roots. When this is put into the original equation, I get $$\epsilon\delta^3\bar x^3+\delta\bar x-2=0$$ I then looked at the coefficients of these terms and decided it was best to use $\delta=\epsilon^{-0.5}$ which gives the new equation $$\epsilon^{-0.5}\bar x^3+\epsilon^{-0.5}\bar x-2=0$$ but when I use the perturbation method with this, and equate the coefficients of different orders of epsilon, I get (for $O(\epsilon^0))$: $$\bar x_0^3+\bar x_0=0$$ which has roots 0, i and -i which surely can't be right? I don't have a clue where I'm going wrong. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
2026-03-25 19:05:15.1774465515
Stuck on perturbation theory for finding a root of polynomial, with rescaling
1.7k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in ROOTS
- How to solve the exponential equation $e^{a+bx}+e^{c+dx}=1$?
- Roots of a complex equation
- Do Irrational Conjugates always come in pairs?
- For $f \in \mathbb{Z}[x]$ , $\deg(\gcd_{\mathbb{Z}_q}(f, x^p - 1)) \geq \deg(\gcd_{\mathbb{Q}}(f, x^p - 1))$
- The Heegner Polynomials
- Roots of a polynomial : finding the sum of the squares of the product of two roots
- Looking for references about a graphical representation of the set of roots of polynomials depending on a parameter
- Approximating the first +ve root of $\tan(\lambda)= \frac{a\lambda+b}{\lambda^2-ab}$, $\lambda\in(0,\pi/2)$
- Find suitable scaling exponent for characteristic polynomial and its largest root
- Form an equation whose roots are $(a-b)^2,(b-c)^2,(c-a)^2.$
Related Questions in PERTURBATION-THEORY
- Is there a book on the purely mathematical version of perturbation theory?
- Limit of a function ("order of magnitude")
- Unusual normalization related to the eigenvector perturbation
- How to expand $\sqrt{x+\epsilon}$ in the following way?
- Perturbative expansion of an expression involving the matrix square root
- Question on perturbation theory
- How to find roots by perturbation methods for this problem?
- Find perturbed eigenvalues, eigenvectors by perturbation methods
- rationalize denominator for perturbation theory
- Solve recurrent ODE (elegantly?)
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
The first root should be $2-8\epsilon$ as it should be up to order 1 not order 0, and what you have for $\bar {x_0}$ is correct except we reject the 0 value as that stops our approximation being of moderate size. You then need to also find $\bar {x_1}$
Yeah that's fine, note that your new direct perturbation should be in powers of $\epsilon^{\frac{1}{2}}$ for $\bar {x}$
You choose both $\bar{x_0}=i,-i$, in each case you get a different root, so by this method we get two more roots. i.e. we have a total of 3, which is good because the equation is cubic.