I want to ask for a proof that if $v(x,y)$ is $C^2$ and is subharmonic [here, define as satisfyingthen $\Delta v \geq 0$ where $\Delta v = \frac{\partial^2 v}{\partial x^2} + \frac{\partial^2 v}{\partial y^2}$ is the Laplacian operator. I think it has something to do with geometric interpretation of $\Delta v$ but I fail to see what kind of interpretation it can be.
2026-03-30 16:41:43.1774888903
Subharmonic function equivalent non-negative laplacian
4.3k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in MULTIVARIABLE-CALCULUS
- Equality of Mixed Partial Derivatives - Simple proof is Confusing
- $\iint_{S} F.\eta dA$ where $F = [3x^2 , y^2 , 0]$ and $S : r(u,v) = [u,v,2u+3v]$
- Proving the differentiability of the following function of two variables
- optimization with strict inequality of variables
- How to find the unit tangent vector of a curve in R^3
- Prove all tangent plane to the cone $x^2+y^2=z^2$ goes through the origin
- Holding intermediate variables constant in partial derivative chain rule
- Find the directional derivative in the point $p$ in the direction $\vec{pp'}$
- Check if $\phi$ is convex
- Define in which points function is continuous
Related Questions in HARMONIC-FUNCTIONS
- Harmonicity is a local property?
- Harmonic functions satisfying given inequality
- Is there Phragmen-Lindelof for $\mathbb{C}_+$ where $f$ is not bounded on $i\mathbb{R}$ but has polynomial growth?
- Solution of a non homogeneous Laplace equation on the unit disk.
- Complex Analysis - Harmonic function as real part of holomorphic function
- Show that u is harmonic
- Physicists construct their potentials starting from the Laplace equation, why they do not use another differential operator, like theta Θ?
- Prove a family of harmonic functions is locally bounded
- Why is $ u=\log(\sqrt{x^2+y^2})$ not harmonic for $x^2 + y^2 <1$?
- Modulus and argument of a holomorphic function.
Related Questions in LAPLACIAN
- Polar Brownian motion not recovering polar Laplacian?
- Trivial demonstration. $\nabla J(r,t)=\frac{\hbar}{im}\nabla\psi^{*}\nabla\psi+\frac{\hbar}{im}\psi\nabla^2\psi$
- Bochner nonnegativity theorem for Laplace-Beltrami eigenfunctions?
- Physicists construct their potentials starting from the Laplace equation, why they do not use another differential operator, like theta Θ?
- Integral of the Laplacian of a function that is constant on the sphere
- Trying to show 9 point laplacian equivalence
- Does the laplacian operator work on time as well as spacial variables?
- Find the Green's function $G(\mathbf{x},\xi)$, such that $\nabla^2G = \delta(\mathbf{x}-\xi)$
- Laplace-Beltrami operator in $\mathbb{R}^m$
- demonstration of vector laplacian in cartesian coordinates
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
We will show the more general characterization of subharmonic function in $\mathbb{R}^{n}$ :
Definitions and prerequisite :
$B_x(r)$ is the ball $\{z\in\mathbb{R}^{n}\mid|z-x|<r\}$ and $B_x(r)\Subset\Omega$ means that $\bar{B}_x(r)\subset\Omega$. $\mathrm{d}\sigma$ is the "surface" measure.
A subharmonic function is a function $u\in\mathcal{C}^{0}\left(\Omega;\mathbb{R}\right)$ such that for all $B_x(r)\Subset\Omega$ and for all harmonic function $\psi$ in $B_x(r)$, we have $$\left(u\leq\psi\text{ on $\partial B_x(r)$}\right)\quad\Longrightarrow\quad\left(u\leq\psi\text{ in $B_x(r)$}\right).$$ Sometimes, $u$ is asked to be upper semi-continuous ; we will not require it here.
An important result to know is the
See Evans - "Partial differential equations" for a proof.
The answer :
We show $1.\Longrightarrow 2.$ Let $\bar{u}$ the harmonic extension of $u$ in $B_x(r)\Subset\Omega$, that is \begin{cases} \Delta \bar{u}=0 & \text{in $B_x(r)$} \\ \bar{u}=u & \text{on $\partial B_x(r)$} \end{cases} We assume known the fact that any harmonic function satisfies the mean value property. Then $$u(x)\leq\bar{u}(x)=\frac{1}{|\partial B_x(r)|}\int_{\partial B_x(r)}\bar{u}(y)\mathrm{d}\sigma(y)=\frac{1}{|\partial B_x(r)|}\int_{\partial B_x(r)}u(y)\mathrm{d}\sigma(y)$$ because $\bar{u}=u$ on $\partial B_x(r)$.
We show $2.\Longrightarrow 1.$ Assume $\psi$ is harmonic in $B_x(r)\Subset\Omega$ and is such that $u\leq\psi$ on $\partial B_x(r)$. We must show that $u\leq\psi$ holds everywhere in $B_x(r)$. To see this, we consider the set $$A=\{z\in B_x(r)\mid (u-\psi)(z)=M\}$$ where $M:=\max_{\bar{B}_x(r)}(u-\psi)$. $A$ is close because $u-\psi$ is continuous, and if $A$ where not open, then there would be an element $z_0\in A$ such that $$B_{z_0}(R)\nsubseteq A\quad\quad\forall R>0.$$ But from $2.$ it follows that $$M=(u-\psi)(y_0)\leq\frac{1}{|\partial B_{y_0}(R)|}\int_{\partial B_{y_0}(R)}(u-\psi)\mathrm{d}\sigma\leq M$$ with equality iff $(u-\psi)=M$ on $\partial B_{y_0}(R)$. This holds for any $R>0$ whence $(u-\psi)=M$ on a ball $B_{y_0}(R_0)$. Hence, $A$ is open, a contradiction. Now there are two cases : if $A\neq\emptyset$, then by connexity of $B_x(r)$, we have $u-\psi=M$ everywhere, hence $u=\psi+M\leq\psi$ in $B_x(r)$ because of the boundary condition $u\le\psi$ (i.e. $M\leq0$); now if $A=\emptyset$, then $\max_{\bar{B}_x(r)}(u-\psi)$ is realized on $\partial B_x(r)$, whence $M\leq0$ because of the boundary condition $u\leq\psi$, and then $u-\psi\leq M\leq0$ in $B_x(r)$. Whatever the situation is, we do end with the conclusion that $u$ is subharmonic.
We show $3.\Longrightarrow 2.$ Let us define $$\mu(r):=\frac{1}{|\partial B_x(r)|}\int_{\partial B_x(r)}u(y)\mathrm{d}\sigma(y).$$ Let us compute \begin{align} \frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d}r}\mu(r) & = \frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d}r}\frac{1}{|\partial B_x(r)|}\int_{\partial B_x(r)}u(y)\mathrm{d}\sigma(y) \\ & = \frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d}r}\frac{1}{|\partial B_0(1)|}\int_{\partial B_0(1)}u(x+ry)\mathrm{d}\sigma(y) \\ & = \frac{1}{|\partial B_0(1)|}\int_{\partial B_0(1)}\nabla u(x+ry)\cdot y\mathrm{d}\sigma(y) \\ & = \frac{1}{|\partial B_x(r)|}\int_{\partial B_x(r)}\nabla u(y)\cdot \frac{y-x}{r}\mathrm{d}\sigma(y). \end{align} Now we remark that $(y-x)/r=\nu$ is the unitary outward normal vector of $\partial B_x(r)$. Then, applying Green's theorem, we find \begin{align} \frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d}r}\mu(r) & = \frac{1}{|\partial B_x(r)|}\int_{\partial B_x(r)}\frac{\partial u}{\partial\nu}(y)\mathrm{d}\sigma(y) \\ & = \frac{1}{|\partial B_x(r)|}\int_{B_x(r)}\Delta u(y)\mathrm{d}y \\ & \geq0 \end{align} whence $\mu$ is non-decreasing. Next, we establish that $\lim\mu(r)=u(x)$ as $r\to0$ : indeed, as $u$ is continuous on $\partial B_x(r)\subsetneq\Omega$, we have for $r$ very small and $y\in\partial B_x(r)$ $$|u(y)-u(x)|<\varepsilon$$ whence $$|\mu(r)-u(x)|\leq\frac{1}{|\partial B_x(r)|}\int_{\partial B_x(r)}|u(y)-u(x)|\mathrm{d}\sigma(y)<\frac{1}{|\partial B_x(r)|}\int_{\partial B_x(r)}\varepsilon\mathrm{d}\sigma(y)=\varepsilon.$$ Therefore, we have $$\frac{1}{|\partial B_x(r)|}\int_{\partial B_x(r)}u(y)\mathrm{d}\sigma(y)=\mu(r)\geq\lim_{r\to0}\mu(r)=u(x)$$ and $2.$ follows.
We show $2.\Longrightarrow 3.$ Assume there is $x_0\in B_x(r)\Subset\Omega$ such that $\Delta u(x_0)<0$. Then if $u\in\mathcal{C}^{2}\left(\Omega;\mathbb{R}\right)$, $\Delta u$ is continuous in $\Omega$ and then there is a radius $r_0\in\left(0,\mathrm{dist}\left(x_0,\partial B_x(r)\right)\right)$ such that $\Delta u<0$ in $B_{x_0}(R)$ for all $R\in\left(0,r_0\right)$. But then, we compute as above that the function $\mu$ is decreasing and hence $$u(x_0)>\frac{1}{|\partial B_{x_0}(r)|}\int_{\partial B_{x_0}(r)}u(y)\mathrm{d}\sigma(y)$$ which shows that $u$ can not be subharmonic in $\Omega$.