After playing around with signed permutations lately, (as part of studying properties of antisymmetric tensors and wedge products which are not really related to what I want to ask about), I noticed that apparently for every integer with $3$ digits or more, the signed alternating sum of its digits permutations is equal to zero.
In order to avoid abusing notation, I'll first define $P_{\pi}(n)$ to be the signed and permuted version of an $N$ digits integer via a given permutation $\pi\in{S_N}$:
$$ P_{\pi}(n) = \text{sign}(\pi)\sum_{i=1}^N{n_i10^{\pi_{i}-1}}$$
Where $n_i$ is assumed to be the $i$'th digit, and I define $n_0$ to be the least significant digit, just to ensure that the original number $n$ maintains its original sign (This way, it is "hit" with the identity permutation).
With the above, I can more clearly restate the observation, that for any $n\in\mathbb{N}$ with $N\ge3$ digits:
$$\sum_{\pi\in{S_{N}}}{P_{\pi}(n)=0}$$
Where it is assumed $\pi$ ranges over all possible elements in $S_N$.
In case this is confusing, a concrete example follows:
$$123-132+312-321+231-213=0$$
My question is whether this is a known result, and if so where can I find more information about this property? BTW, I haven't proved this, so I should also ask whether this even holds true or not (although at this point I am rather convinced it is). It should be straightforward to prove via mathematical induction I think, although it may be more enlightening to see a more direct proof (I tried to write one, but those anti symmetrized sums get really cumbersome really quickly and I gave up for now :)).
Nice observation! We have
\begin{align*} \sum_{\pi\in{S_{N}}} \text{sign}(\pi)\sum_{i=1}^N{n_i10^{\pi_{i}-1}} &= \sum_{i=1}^N n_i \sum_{\pi\in{S_{N}}} \text{sign}(\pi){10^{\pi_{i}-1}}\\ &= \sum_{i=1}^N n_i \sum_j 10^{j-1} \sum_{\pi\in{S_{N}| \pi(i) = j}} \text{sign}(\pi) \end{align*}
Now note that every $\pi$ with $\pi(i) = j$ can be written as $\pi = (1j) \tau (1i)$ where $(1j)$ and $(1i)$ are cycles $1\mapsto j \mapsto 1$ and $1 \mapsto i \mapsto 1$, and $\tau(1) = 1$. Then we have $\text{sign}(\pi) = \text{sign}((1j))\text{sign}(\tau)\pi((1i)) (= \text{sign}(\tau)$ unless $j=1$ or $i = 1$.) Note that $\sum_{\tau \in S_n} \text{sign}(\tau) = 0$ since there are an equal number of even and odd permutations (unless $n = 1$). We can think of $\tau$ as a permutation of $2,3, \ldots N$ or $\tau \in S_{N-1}$. So for $N >2$ and any fixed $i,j$, we have
\begin{align*} \sum_{\pi\in{S_{N}| \pi(i) = j}} \text{sign}(\pi) = \sum_{\tau\in{S_{N-1}| \pi(i) = j}} \text{sign}(1j)\text{sign}(1i) \text{sign}(\tau)\\ = \text{sign}(1j)\text{sign}(1i) \sum_{\tau\in{S_{N-1}| \pi(i) = j}}\text{sign}(\tau)=0. \end{align*}
Note that there's nothing too special about taking digits of numbers here; you can extend this for sums of the form $n_1a_1 + \ldots + n_N a_N$ for $a_1, a_2, \ldots, a_N$ arbitrary constants and $n_1, n_2, \ldots n_N$ permuted in all possible ways. In this particular case we take $a_1, a_2,\ldots, a_N = 1, 10, \ldots, 10^{N-1}$.