Let me preface by saying that this question does not pertain as much to coding theory, as it does to mathematical notation. Every symbol in this question is a natural number.
Anyhow, I am currently reading through a proof of McMillan's Theorem. In the proof, there is the statement that \begin{equation}\tag{1} \left( \sum_{j=1}^m \dfrac{\alpha_j}{r^j} \right)^u = \left( \dfrac{\alpha_1}{r} + \cdots + \dfrac{\alpha_m}{r^m} \right)^u, \end{equation}
and so far, so good. However, the next line states that $(1)$ out can be multiplied out to yield
\begin{equation}\tag{2} \sum_{\substack{1 \leq i_j \leq m \\ i_1, i_2, \cdots, i_u}} \dfrac{\alpha_{i_1}}{r^{i_1}} \cdots \dfrac{\alpha_{i_u}}{r^{i_u}} = \sum_{\substack{1 \leq i_j \leq m \\ i_1, i_2, \cdots, i_u}} \dfrac{\alpha_{i_1} \alpha_{i_2} \cdots \alpha_{i_u}}{r^{i_1 + \cdots + i_u}}, \end{equation}
which confuses me. Can someone explain to me what the subscripts on the sigmas in equation $(2)$ are meant to indicate?
Also, I apologize if this question has already been answered somewhere else. I tried to look through the archives and didn't come across it.
To avoid clutter, let
$$f(i_1,i_2,\ldots,i_u)=\frac{\alpha_1}{r^{i_1}}\cdot\frac{\alpha_2}{r^{i_2}}\cdot\ldots\cdot\frac{\alpha_u}{r^{i_u}}\;.\tag{1}$$
(It could just as well be any function of $u$ variables.) Then
$$\sum_{\substack{1\le i_j\le m\\i_1,i_2,\ldots,i_u}}f(i_1,\ldots,i_u)\tag{2}$$
is the sum of the values $f(i_1,\ldots,i_u)$ as $\langle i_1,i_2,\ldots,i_u\rangle$ ranges over all $u$-tuples of integers satisfying the condition that $1\le i_j\le m$ for $j=1,\ldots,u$. For example, if $u=3$ and $m=2$, we have
$$\begin{align*}\sum_{\substack{1\le i_j\le 2\\i_1,i_2,i_3}}f(i_1,i_2,i_3)&=f(1,1,1)+f(1,1,2)+f(1,2,1)+f(1,2,2)\\ &\quad+f(2,1,1)+f(2,1,2)+f(2,2,1)+f(2,2,2)\;. \end{align*}$$
In general there will be $m^u$ terms in the sum, since each of the $u$ indices $i_j$ can take any of the $m$ values from $1$ through $m$.
When you multiply out
$$\left(\sum_{j=1}^m\frac{\alpha_j}{r^j}\right)^u=\underbrace{\left(\sum_{j=1}^m\frac{\alpha_j}{r^j}\right)\cdot\ldots\cdot\left(\sum_{j=1}^m\frac{\alpha_j}{r^j}\right)}_{u\text{ copies}}\;,\tag{3}$$
each term of the product (before you collect like terms) is the product of fractions $\frac{\alpha_j}{r^j}$, one from each of the $u$ copies, so it has exactly the form of our $f(i_1,\ldots,i_u)$ in $(1)$. $(2)$ is the sum of all of these terms, so it’s equal to $(3)$.