For a nonnegative supermartingale $(M_n)_{n\in\mathbb{N}}$ I would like to prove that $$E[\sup_n M_n] \leq E[M_0]$$ I have that $E[M_n] \leq E[M_0]$ for every $n$. This combined with nonnegativity gives me $L^1$-boundedness so then I can apply Doob's convergence theorem, i.e. $$\lim_n M_n = M_{\infty} \quad \text{a.s.}$$ and $E[M_\infty] < \infty$. I thought of using Scheffe's lemma from here on but couldn't arrive at much.
2026-04-04 10:38:26.1775299106
Supremum of a supermartingale
579 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in PROBABILITY-THEORY
- Is this a commonly known paradox?
- What's $P(A_1\cap A_2\cap A_3\cap A_4) $?
- Another application of the Central Limit Theorem
- proving Kochen-Stone lemma...
- Is there a contradiction in coin toss of expected / actual results?
- Sample each point with flipping coin, what is the average?
- Random variables coincide
- Reference request for a lemma on the expected value of Hermitian polynomials of Gaussian random variables.
- Determine the marginal distributions of $(T_1, T_2)$
- Convergence in distribution of a discretized random variable and generated sigma-algebras
Related Questions in MEASURE-THEORY
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Absolutely continuous functions are dense in $L^1$
- I can't undestand why $ \{x \in X : f(x) > g(x) \} = \bigcup_{r \in \mathbb{Q}}{\{x\in X : f(x) > r\}\cap\{x\in X:g(x) < r\}} $
- Trace $\sigma$-algebra of a product $\sigma$-algebra is product $\sigma$-algebra of the trace $\sigma$-algebras
- Meaning of a double integral
- Random variables coincide
- Convergence in measure preserves measurability
- Convergence in distribution of a discretized random variable and generated sigma-algebras
- A sequence of absolutely continuous functions whose derivatives converge to $0$ a.e
- $f\in L_{p_1}\cap L_{p_2}$ implies $f\in L_{p}$ for all $p\in (p_1,p_2)$
Related Questions in MARTINGALES
- CLT for Martingales
- Find Expected Value of Martingale $X_n$
- Need to find Conditions to get a (sub-)martingale
- Martingale conditional expectation
- Sum of two martingales
- Discrete martingale stopping time
- Optional Stopping Theorem for martingales
- Prove that the following is a martingale
- Are all martingales uniformly integrable
- Cross Variation of stochatic integrals
Related Questions in SUPREMUM-AND-INFIMUM
- $\inf A = -\sup (-A)$
- Supremum of Sumset (Proof Writing)
- If $A\subseteq(0,+\infty)$ is nonempty and closed under addition then it is not bounded above.
- Distance between a point $x \in \mathbb R^2$ and $x_1^2+x_2^2 \le 4$
- Prove using the completeness axiom?
- comparing sup and inf of two sets
- Supremum of the operator norm of Jacobian matrix
- Show that Minkowski functional is a sublinear functional
- Trying to figure out $\mu(\liminf_{n\to \infty}A_n) \le \liminf_{n\to \infty}\mu(A_n)$
- Real numbers to real powers
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
I doubt it. Definitely we have $\sup_n M_n \geq M_0$, which means that your inequality forces the relation $\sup_n M_n = M_0$ a.s., which seems very unlikely.
For example, consider the martingale $(M_n)$ defined by $M_0 = 1$ and $M_{n+1} = X_{n+1} M_n$ for an i.i.d. sequence $(X_n)$ with $\Bbb{P}(X_n = 0) = \Bbb{P}(X_n = 2) = 1/2$. Then we have
$$\textstyle\Bbb{P}(\sup_n M_n = 2^k) = 2^{-(k+1)}$$
and hence the expectation of the supremum is infinite:
$$\textstyle\Bbb{E}(\sup_n M_n) = +\infty.$$