Let $D = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 & 0 \\ -1 & 1 & 0 \\ -2 & -1 & 1 \end{pmatrix}$ and let $\Phi = -D^{-1}D^t$. Then $\Phi$ is a Coxeter transformation (which is probably not important for this question.) However, we have
$$\Phi = \begin{pmatrix} -1 & 1 & 2 \\ -1 & 0 & 3 \\ -3 & 2 & 6 \end{pmatrix}, \text{ and } \Phi^{-1} = \begin{pmatrix} 6 & 2 & -3 \\ 3 & 0 & -1 \\ 2 & 1 & -1 \end{pmatrix},$$
so $\Phi^{-1}$ is just a point reflection of $\Phi$, with reflection center being the middle. Do you know why this holds? Probably one can use that Coxeter transformations can be written as a product of reflections and use that the reflections are their own inverse and then do something with permutation matrices. But I would like to know if there is some more elementary proof? Probably we also need that $D + D^t$ does not only have the property that it is symmetric, but also the property that it is point-symmetric (since this seems to go in in my other proof idea).
A direct computation shows that any lower-unitriangular $3\times 3$-matrix $$ D=\begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 & 0 \cr a & 1 & 0 \cr b & c & 1 \end{pmatrix} $$ satisfies this with $\Phi=-D^{-1}D^t$ if and only if $a=c$. The computation is elementary, too.