Can I expand in Taylor series around zero an equation which is trivial around this point. For example, if we consider $$1+2(1-\epsilon)^x-3(1-\epsilon)^{1-x}=0$$ For $\epsilon=0$, any $x$ is solution, but for small $\epsilon$, we get $3/5$. Is the series convergent?
2026-03-25 22:03:16.1774476196
Taylor series around a trivial point
93 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in TAYLOR-EXPANSION
- Mc Laurin and his derivative.
- Maclaurin polynomial estimating $\sin 15°$
- why can we expand an expandable function for infinite?
- Solving a limit of $\frac{\ln(x)}{x-1}$ with taylor expansion
- How to I find the Taylor series of $\ln {\frac{|1-x|}{1+x^2}}$?
- Proving the binomial series for all real (complex) n using Taylor series
- Taylor series of multivariable functions problem
- Taylor series of $\frac{\cosh(t)-1}{\sinh(t)}$
- The dimension of formal series modulo $\sin(x)$
- Finding Sum of First Terms
Related Questions in SINGULARITY
- Homogeneous quadratic in $n$ variables has nonzero singular point iff associated symmetric matrix has zero determinant.
- How do I show with Laurent Series Expansion that $1/z$ has a simple pole for $z=z_0=0$?
- Order of Poles of $1/\cos(1/z)$
- Let $f(x, y) = y^2 - g(x) \in \mathbb{R}[x, y]$. Show that $(0, 0)$ is a singular point if and only if $g(x) = x^2(x-a)$.
- Classification of singularities of $\sin\left( \frac{1}{\sin(\frac{1}{z})}\right)$
- $z=0$ is a removal singularity of $f$. (T/F)
- Laurent expansion and singularities of $\frac{1-\cos(z)}{e^{2iz}-1}$
- Example of integrable function which is nowhere $p$-integrable
- Proving $0$ is a removable singularity
- solve $XA = B$ in MATLAB
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
If you expand the series around $x=0$, you should get $$f(x)=1+2(1-\epsilon)^x-3(1-\epsilon)^{1-x}$$ $$f(x)=3 \epsilon + (5-3 \epsilon ) \log (1-\epsilon )x+\frac{1}{2} (3 \epsilon -1) \log ^2(1-\epsilon )x^2+$$ $$\frac{1}{6} (5-3 \epsilon ) \log ^3(1-\epsilon )x^3 +\frac{1}{24} (3 \epsilon -1) \log ^4(1-\epsilon )x^4+O\left(x^5\right)$$ Now, using reversion and continuing with Taylor series for small values of $\epsilon$, this would give $$x=\frac{3}{5}+\frac{3 \epsilon }{125}+\frac{97 \epsilon ^2}{6250}+\frac{737 \epsilon ^3}{62500}+\frac{11267 \epsilon ^4}{1875000}+O\left(\epsilon ^5\right)\tag 1$$
Let us check using a few values of $\epsilon$. This would give the following results
$$\left( \begin{array}{ccc} k & \text{estimate} & \text{solution} \\ 0.01 & 0.6002415639 & 0.6002415639 \\ 0.02 & 0.6004863033 & 0.6004863033 \\ 0.03 & 0.6007342913 & 0.6007342913 \\ 0.04 & 0.6009856021 & 0.6009856021 \\ 0.05 & 0.6012403116 & 0.6012403368 \\ 0.06 & 0.6014984969 & 0.6014985504 \\ 0.07 & 0.6017602369 & 0.6017603382 \\ 0.08 & 0.6020256116 & 0.6020257882 \\ 0.09 & 0.6022947026 & 0.6022949917 \\ 0.10 & 0.6025675929 & 0.6025680432 \\ 0.15 & 0.6039920401 & 0.6039945801 \\ 0.20 & 0.6055247505 & 0.6055336894 \\ 0.25 & 0.6071777229 & 0.6072020225 \\ 0.30 & 0.6089638574 & 0.6090199962 \\ 0.35 & 0.6108969556 & 0.6110129827 \\ 0.40 & 0.6129917201 & 0.6132129984 \\ 0.45 & 0.6152637553 & 0.6156611519 \\ 0.50 & 0.6177295667 & 0.6184113537 \end{array} \right)$$ which seem too be more than reasonable.
However, you do not need Taylor expansion at all. Changing variable $(1-\epsilon)^x=y$, you end with a quadratic in $y$ $$2 y^2+y+3 \epsilon -3=0 \implies y=\frac{1}{4} \left(\sqrt{25-24 \epsilon }-1\right)\implies \color{red}{x=\frac{\log \left(\frac{1}{4} \left(\sqrt{25-24 \epsilon }-1\right)\right)}{\log (1-\epsilon )}}$$ which is totally explicit.
Expanded as a series would give $$x=\frac{3}{5}+\frac{3 \epsilon }{125}+\frac{97 \epsilon ^2}{6250}+\frac{737 \epsilon ^3}{62500}+\frac{450803 \epsilon ^4}{46875000}+O\left(\epsilon ^5\right)\tag 2$$
Remark that $(1)$ and $(2)$ differ by $\frac{7047 \epsilon ^4}{1953125}$ that is to say $0.0036 \epsilon ^4$.
I think that the analytical solution is, from far away, much better.