If I am the basis vector $e_i$ into another basis to get $e'_j$ I use: $$e'_j=S_{ij}e_i$$ My text book says that $S_{ij}$ is the ith component of the vector $e'_j$ with respect to the unprimed basis. Please can you explain what this last sentence means what does this mean (in simpler terms)? Thanks
Tensor tranformation between basis?
44 Views Asked by user135842 https://math.techqa.club/user/user135842/detail AtThere are 3 best solutions below
On
Here the formula $$e'_j=S_{ij}e_i$$ really means that $$e'_j=\sum_{i=1}^nS_{ij}e_i.$$ Now it is clear that $S_{ij}$ is the ith component of the vector $e'_j$ with respect to the unprimed basis.
On
As others have pointed out, you have an implicit summation going over the index $i$, called Einstein Summation. I would like to do an explicit example.
Consider two basis $\beta = \{ e_1, e_2, e_3 \}$ and $\beta' = \{ e_1', e_2', e_3' \}$ of $\Bbb R^3$ where $$\left\{ \begin{align} e_1 & = (1,1,0), \\ e_2 & = (1,0,1), \\ e_3 & = (0,0,1), \end{align} \right.$$ and $$\left\{ \begin{align} e_1' & = (2,0,3), \\ e_2' & = (4,0,0), \\ e_3' & = (0,1,0). \end{align} \right.$$ That relation says that $$\left\{ \begin{align} e_1' & = \sum_{i=1}^3 S_{i1}e_i = S_{11} e_1 + S_{21} e_2 + S_{31} e_3, \\ e_2' & = \sum_{i=1}^3 S_{i2}e_i = S_{12} e_1 + S_{22} e_2 + S_{32} e_3, \\ e_3' & = \sum_{i=1}^3 S_{i3}e_i = S_{13} e_1 + S_{23} e_2 + S_{33} e_3. \end{align} \right.$$ Just as an example, writing the first in matrix form: $$\begin{bmatrix} 2 \\ 0 \\ 3 \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} S_{11} & S_{12} & S_{13} \\ S_{21} & S_{22} & S_{23} \\ S_{31} & S_{32} & S_{33} \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} 1 \\ 1 \\ 0 \end{bmatrix}.$$ Write those sums in coordinates, you'll arrive at: $$\left\{ \begin{align} (2,0,3) & = (S_{11} + S_{21}, S_{11}, S_{21} + S_{31}), \\ (4,0,0) & = (S_{12} + S_{22}, S_{12}, S_{22} + S_{32}), \\ (0,1,0) & = (S_{13} + S_{23}, S_{13}, S_{23} + S_{33}). \end{align} \right.$$ This is straightforward to solve and you'll find $$[S]_{\beta}^{\beta'} = \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 & 1 \\ 2 & 4 & -1 \\ 1 & -4 & 1 \end{bmatrix}.$$
The last sentence means exactly what's written in the equation: If you write $e'_j = S_{ij} e_i = S_{1j} e_1 + S_{2j} e_2 + \cdots + S_{nj} e_n$ over the $\{e_n\}$ basis, then the coefficient of $e_i$ is exactly $S_{ij}$. (Since the $e_i$ are a basis, the $S_{ij}$ are well-defined and unique.)
It might be throwing you off that the book is presumably using the Einstein summation convention here: repeated free indices (i.e., here, indices only on one side of the equation) are summed over. Thus $$e'_j = S_{ij} e_i$$ actually means $$e'_j = \sum_{i = 1}^n S_{ij} e_i.$$ It's a common convention when dealing with tensor calculus, especially in physics, to simplify all the bookkeeping.