The author of my text proves the properties of a topological space—(T1-3)—by
But I don't really understand the statement in the proof of (T1) where he claims "...and, obviously, $X$ is open."
Is he saying that $X$ has to be open for that property to hold, or is he saying that he also proved that $X$ must be open. Because the former makes sense. Just making sure I'm thinking about it right.

Actually I think he means the latter -- in a metric space, a set $S$ is open, if for each its element, there is an open ball with positive radius centered at it, which is contained in $S$. Obviously, $X$ satisfies this definition, as every open ball is by definition a subset of $X$.