How can I demonstrate that the notion of a vanishing mean oscillation point (VMO) is more general than a Lebesgue point?
The point $y\in\mathbb{R}^n$ is a Lebesgue point if:
$$ \lim_{r\to 0} \oint_{B_r(y)} |f(x)-f(y)|\; dx = 0 $$
The point $y\in\mathbb{R}^n$ is a VMO point (vanishing mean oscillation) if:
$$ \lim_{r\to 0} \oint_{B_r(y)} |f(x)-(f)_{y,r}|\; dx = 0 $$
Here $\oint_U f=\frac{1}{|V|}\int_V f$ is the average integral of $f$ (I don't know the command in LateX to write an integral with a dash in the middle). And $(f)_{y,r} = \oint_{B_r(y)}$.
I tried to put the limit inside the integral. But I can't see that it generalizes.
Some references
VMO1: p. 2 of https://www.ams.org/journals/tran/1975-207-00/S0002-9947-1975-0377518-3/S0002-9947-1975-0377518-3.pdf
VMO 2: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bounded_mean_oscillation
Lebesgue point: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lebesgue_point
Using the Lebesgue differentiation Theorem we know that:
$$ \lim_{r\to 0+}\left(\frac{1}{|B_r(y)|}\int_{B_r(y)} f(x)\, dx \right) = f(y)\; a.e \; y\in \mathbb{R}^n $$
Then
$$ \oint_{B_r(y)} |f(x)-(f)_{r,y} |\; dx \leq \oint_{B_r(y)} |f(x)-f(y)|\, dx + \oint_{B_r(y)} |f(y)-(f)_{r,y} | \to 0$$
Where the first installment of the sum goes to 0 if $y$ is a Lebesgue point and the second, is the Lebesgue Differentiation Theorem above.