Given a integral domain , we can construct its field of fractions.But if given a field $K$ ,how can know what are the intergal domains such that their field of fractions are $K$? Can we constuct them? For example , for the complex field $\mathbb{C}$ ,do there exist intergal domains such that their field of fractions are $\mathbb{C}$? If there exist ,how many kind of them up to isomorphism?
2026-03-28 11:34:24.1774697664
The relation between integral domains and their field of fractions.
505 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in ABSTRACT-ALGEBRA
- Feel lost in the scheme of the reducibility of polynomials over $\Bbb Z$ or $\Bbb Q$
- Integral Domain and Degree of Polynomials in $R[X]$
- Fixed points of automorphisms of $\mathbb{Q}(\zeta)$
- Group with order $pq$ has subgroups of order $p$ and $q$
- A commutative ring is prime if and only if it is a domain.
- Conjugacy class formula
- Find gcd and invertible elements of a ring.
- Extending a linear action to monomials of higher degree
- polynomial remainder theorem proof, is it legit?
- $(2,1+\sqrt{-5}) \not \cong \mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]$ as $\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]$-module
Related Questions in RING-THEORY
- Jacobson radical = nilradical iff every open set of $\text{Spec}A$ contains a closed point.
- A commutative ring is prime if and only if it is a domain.
- Find gcd and invertible elements of a ring.
- Prove that $R[x]$ is an integral domain if and only if $R$ is an integral domain.
- Prove that $Z[i]/(5)$ is not a field. Check proof?
- If $P$ is a prime ideal of $R[x;\delta]$ such as $P\cap R=\{0\}$, is $P(Q[x;\delta])$ also prime?
- Let $R$ be a simple ring having a minimal left ideal $L$. Then every simple $R$-module is isomorphic to $L$.
- A quotient of a polynomial ring
- Does a ring isomorphism between two $F$-algebras must be a $F$-linear transformation
- Prove that a ring of fractions is a local ring
Related Questions in FIELD-THEORY
- Square classes of a real closed field
- Question about existence of Galois extension
- Proving addition is associative in $\mathbb{R}$
- Two minor questions about a transcendental number over $\Bbb Q$
- Is it possible for an infinite field that does not contain a subfield isomorphic to $\Bbb Q$?
- Proving that the fraction field of a $k[x,y]/(f)$ is isomorphic to $k(t)$
- Finding a generator of GF(16)*
- Operator notation for arbitrary fields
- Studying the $F[x]/\langle p(x)\rangle$ when $p(x)$ is any degree.
- Proof of normal basis theorem for finite fields
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Let $\mathcal{E}$ be the set of subrings $\mathcal{O}$ of $\mathbb{C}$ which do not contain $1/2$. The set $\mathcal{E}$ is not empty, as it contains $\mathbb{Z}$. If $(\mathcal{O}_i)_{i\in I}\subset \mathcal{E}$ is a totally ordered (by inclusion) subset of $\mathcal{E}$, then $\cup_{i\in I} \mathcal{O}_i$ is a ring, not containing $1/2$, so is in $\mathcal{E}$ and an upper bound for all the $\mathcal{O}_i$ .
So Zorn's Lemma applies: there exist a maximal subring $\mathcal{O}\subset \mathbb{C}$, not containing $1/2$.
Let $k$ be the field of fraction of $\mathcal{O}$. We wish to prove that $k=\mathbb{C}$.
Otherwise, there would exist $x\in \mathbb{C}-k$. Since $\mathcal{O}[x]\neq \mathcal{O}$, maximality of $\mathcal{O}$ means that $1/2\in \mathcal{O}[x]$. so there exists $n\geq 1$ and $a_i \in \mathcal{O}$, such that
$$\frac12=a_0+a_1 x + ...+ a_n x^n.$$
So $x$ is algebraic over $k$, of degree $d\geq 2$ since $x\notin k$. We would like to replace $x$ by a multiple $y=bx$, $b\in \mathcal{O}-\{0\}$, so that the minimal polynomial of $y$ has coefficients in $\mathcal{O}$. This is done as follows.
There exists $b\in \mathcal{O}-\{0\}$ such that the minimal polynomial of $bx$ in $k[X]$ has coefficients in $\mathcal{O}$; indeed, if $P_x\in k[X]$ is the minimal polynomial of $x$, $$P_x=X^d+\sum_{i=0}^{d-1} \frac{p_i}{q_i}X^i,$$ where $p_i,q_i \in \mathcal{O}$, $q_i\neq 0$, then $b=q_0...q_{d-1}$ does the trick, and $k[bx]=k[x]$. So, putting now $y=bx$, we still have $\mathcal{O}[y]\neq \mathcal{O}$, so by maximality $1/2 \in \mathcal{O}[y]$. So there exist $m>0$ and coefficients $c_i \in \mathcal{O}$ such that
$$\frac12=c_0+c_1 y + ...+ c_m y^m=Q(y).$$
We may assume that $m<d$: to see this, since the minimal polynomial $P_y$ of $y$ over $k$ is in $\mathcal{O}[X]$, and is unitary, we may use an euclidean division in $\mathcal{O}[X]$, $Q=LP_y+R$, where $R \in \mathcal{O}[X]$ has degree $<d$, and replace $Q$ by $R$ in the preceding equality. Therefore, $y$ is a zero of the following polynomial $$2c_mX^m+...+2c_1X+(2c_0-1).$$ Since $2c_0-1\neq 0$, the polynomial is nonzero, but $y$ is algebraic over $k$ of degree $d>m$. This is a contradiction, showing that no such $x$ exists.
(The proof for $\mathbb{R}$ is the same.)