I do not undersand how to take the time derivative of the following Hamiltonian $\hat{H}(t) = \frac{\hat{p}^2}{2m} + \frac{1}{2}m\omega^2(\hat{x}-a(t))^2$ where $a(t) = v_0t$. For instance how does $\hat{p}$ change when taking the time derivative of it? And the same for $\hat{x}$.
2026-03-30 20:42:59.1774903379
The time-derivative of the Hamiltonian for a 1D harmonic potential
46 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in DERIVATIVES
- Derivative of $ \sqrt x + sinx $
- Second directional derivative of a scaler in polar coordinate
- A problem on mathematical analysis.
- Why the derivative of $T(\gamma(s))$ is $T$ if this composition is not a linear transformation?
- Does there exist any relationship between non-constant $N$-Exhaustible function and differentiability?
- Holding intermediate variables constant in partial derivative chain rule
- How would I simplify this fraction easily?
- Why is the derivative of a vector in polar form the cross product?
- Proving smoothness for a sequence of functions.
- Gradient and Hessian of quadratic form
Related Questions in OPERATOR-ALGEBRAS
- Bijection between $\Delta(A)$ and $\mathrm{Max}(A)$
- hyponormal operators
- Cuntz-Krieger algebra as crossed product
- Identifying $C(X\times X)$ with $C(X)\otimes C(X)$
- If $A\in\mathcal{L}(E)$, why $\lim\limits_{n\to+\infty}\|A^n\|^{1/n}$ always exists?
- Given two projections $p,q$ in a C$^{*}$-algebra $E$, find all irreducible representations of $C^{*}(p,q)$
- projective and Haagerup tensor norms
- AF-algebras and K-theory
- How to show range of a projection is an eigenspace.
- Is $\left\lVert f_U-f_V\right\rVert_{op}\leq \left\lVert U-V\right\rVert_2$ where $f_U = A\mapsto UAU^*$?
Related Questions in HARMONIC-FUNCTIONS
- Harmonicity is a local property?
- Harmonic functions satisfying given inequality
- Is there Phragmen-Lindelof for $\mathbb{C}_+$ where $f$ is not bounded on $i\mathbb{R}$ but has polynomial growth?
- Solution of a non homogeneous Laplace equation on the unit disk.
- Complex Analysis - Harmonic function as real part of holomorphic function
- Show that u is harmonic
- Physicists construct their potentials starting from the Laplace equation, why they do not use another differential operator, like theta Θ?
- Prove a family of harmonic functions is locally bounded
- Why is $ u=\log(\sqrt{x^2+y^2})$ not harmonic for $x^2 + y^2 <1$?
- Modulus and argument of a holomorphic function.
Related Questions in QUANTUM-MECHANICS
- Is there a book on the purely mathematical version of perturbation theory?
- Matrix differential equation and matrix exponential
- "Good" Linear Combinations of a Perturbed Wave Function
- Necessary condition for Hermician lin operators
- What is a symplectic form of the rotation group SO(n)
- Why is $\textbf{J}$ called angular momentum?(Quantum)
- How does the quantumstate evolve?
- Differential equation $au''(x)+b\frac{u(x)}{x}+Eu=0$
- How to model this system of $^{238}\,U$ atoms?
- Discrete spectra of generators of compact Lie group
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
The way you have written it, without time arguments in $\hat p$ and $\hat x$, these two operators are presumed to be in the Schrödinger representation, i.e., time independent. Thus $$ \frac{d}{dt} \hat H(t)=\partial_t \hat H(t)=v_0(v_0 t-\hat x). $$
Note this is not the Galilean transform of the oscillator hamiltonian, but, instead, a Hamiltonian canonically equivalent to the $v_0=0$ case, and with the same spectrum as it. (Under a quantum canonical transformation, the commutation relations are preserved.)
It would be perverse & unfriendly to assume your expression is in the Heisenberg picture while omitting the (t), as the Schrödinger operator above would have to be converted into the corresponding Heisenberg one, $U(t)^\dagger v_0(v_0 t-\hat x) U(t)$, liable to confuse you, if you are asking this question.