I'm currently reading some notes about optimal transport and here there is the definition of total variation:$$\Vert\mu\Vert_{TV}=2\sup\vert\mu(A)\vert$$where $\mu$ is a probability measure of the Wasserstein space $W_2$ over a Polish space $X$. Later there's written that given two probability measures $\mu,\nu\in W_2$ then $$\Vert\mu-\nu\Vert_{TV}=2(\nu-\mu)_+(X)$$where $(\cdot)_+$ is the positive part of the Hahn decomposition, but I think that this is not true for any probability measure, maybe the $W_2$ space is involved but I don't see how.
2026-02-23 10:14:22.1771841662
Total variation and probability measures
164 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in PROBABILITY-THEORY
- Is this a commonly known paradox?
- What's $P(A_1\cap A_2\cap A_3\cap A_4) $?
- Another application of the Central Limit Theorem
- proving Kochen-Stone lemma...
- Is there a contradiction in coin toss of expected / actual results?
- Sample each point with flipping coin, what is the average?
- Random variables coincide
- Reference request for a lemma on the expected value of Hermitian polynomials of Gaussian random variables.
- Determine the marginal distributions of $(T_1, T_2)$
- Convergence in distribution of a discretized random variable and generated sigma-algebras
Related Questions in MEASURE-THEORY
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Absolutely continuous functions are dense in $L^1$
- I can't undestand why $ \{x \in X : f(x) > g(x) \} = \bigcup_{r \in \mathbb{Q}}{\{x\in X : f(x) > r\}\cap\{x\in X:g(x) < r\}} $
- Trace $\sigma$-algebra of a product $\sigma$-algebra is product $\sigma$-algebra of the trace $\sigma$-algebras
- Meaning of a double integral
- Random variables coincide
- Convergence in measure preserves measurability
- Convergence in distribution of a discretized random variable and generated sigma-algebras
- A sequence of absolutely continuous functions whose derivatives converge to $0$ a.e
- $f\in L_{p_1}\cap L_{p_2}$ implies $f\in L_{p}$ for all $p\in (p_1,p_2)$
Related Questions in TOTAL-VARIATION
- Total variation of two distributions
- Total Variation sign
- The Dual Norm of Total Variation Norm (Form of $ \left \langle \cdot, \cdot \right \rangle $) By Smoothing
- Given a family of probability distributions that are "close to each other" and have expected values 1, 2, 3..., find a lower bound on their variance
- Are $L^2$ and total variation-linked norms equivalent on this function space?
- The total $p$-variation of a standard Brownian motion is infinite almost surely for any $p > 1/2$
- Sum of total variation over countable partition of interval equals variation over interval?
- Finding the gradient of a variant of a total variation regularized least squares cost function
- Questions about Newman's simplified proof of Ramanujan's partition formula
- Proving from definitions that total variation of an absolutely continuous function is absolutely continuous
Related Questions in POLISH-SPACES
- Continuous image of a Polish space to another has the Baire property
- A consequence of the Selection Theorem for the Effros Borel space F(X) - self study
- How to Modify a Borel function in a Borel way-Self study
- When does a subset of a Polish space meet all the orbits?
- Compact subsets of Polish spaces
- Equivalence relation induced by a group action is an analytic set
- Every quasi-invariant measures is in an invariant measure class (Zimmer)
- Existence of a sequence of independent $E$-valued random variables with distribution $\mu$ given $\mu$ and $E$ Polish
- Equivalence of total boundedness and relative compactness in Polish spaces.
- Maximal Domain of Continuity
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Your second formula is true according the standard definition of total variation found, for example, in Ruidn's RCA. But the definition given in the first formula is not standard and it is not compatible with the second formula.
Let $\tau=\mu -\lambda$. Note that $\tau (X)=0$ so $\tau^{+}(X)=\tau^{-}(X)$. Hence, $\|\tau\|=|\tau |(X)=\tau^{+}(X)+\tau^{-}(X)=2\tau^{+}(X)$.