Let $A: V\to V$ and $B: W\to W$ be linear operators on vector spaces $V$ and $W$. I know how to prove $$\operatorname{tr}(A\otimes B) = \operatorname{tr}(A)\operatorname{tr}(B)$$ by appealing to a basis $\{a_i\}$ of $V$ and $\{b_j\}$ of $W$, and using the product basis $\{a_i\otimes b_j\}$ of $A\otimes B$, but I'm wondering if there is a way to prove this without talking about bases at all. I know there is a coordinate free characterization of the trace, but I'm not familiar enough with it to put it into use.
2026-04-03 02:39:51.1775183991
Trace of tensor product identity
1.2k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LINEAR-ALGEBRA
- An underdetermined system derived for rotated coordinate system
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- Alternate basis for a subspace of $\mathcal P_3(\mathbb R)$?
- Why the derivative of $T(\gamma(s))$ is $T$ if this composition is not a linear transformation?
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Summation in subsets
- $C=AB-BA$. If $CA=AC$, then $C$ is not invertible.
- Basis of span in $R^4$
- Prove if A is regular skew symmetric, I+A is regular (with obstacles)
Related Questions in TENSOR-PRODUCTS
- Tensor product commutes with infinite products
- Inclusions in tensor products
- How to prove that $f\otimes g: V\otimes W\to X\otimes Y$ is a monomorphism
- What does a direct sum of tensor products look like?
- Tensors transformations under $so(4)$
- Tensor modules of tensor algebras
- projective and Haagerup tensor norms
- Algebraic Tensor product of Hilbert spaces
- Why $\displaystyle\lim_{n\to+\infty}x_n\otimes y_n=x\otimes y\;?$
- Proposition 3.7 in Atiyah-Macdonald (Tensor product of fractions is fraction of tensor product)
Related Questions in TRACE
- How to show that extension of linear connection commutes with contraction.
- Basis-free proof of the fact that traceless linear maps are sums of commutators
- $\mathrm{tr}(AB)=\mathrm{tr}(BA)$ proof
- Similar 2x2 matrices of trace zero
- Basis of Image and kernel of Linear Transformation $\mathbb(M_{2,2})\rightarrow\mathbb(R^3) = (trace(A), 5*Trace(A), - Trace(A))$
- Replace $X$ with $\mbox{diag}(x)$ in trace matrix derivative identity
- Proving that a composition of bounded operator and trace class operator is trace class
- If $A \in \mathcal M_n(\mathbb C)$ is of finite order then $\vert \operatorname{tr}(A) \vert \le n$
- Characterisations of traces on $F(H)$
- "Symmetry of trace" passage in the proof of Chern Weil.
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Mechanically, the proof using the coordinate-free characterization won't be all that different from what you likely did using the product basis.
Here's one approach. We claim without proof that that there exist rank-$1$ operators $A_1,\dots,A_p$ and $B_1,\dots,B_q$ such that $A = \sum_j A_j$ and $B = \sum_k B_k$. This statement is usually proved using the existence of a rank factorization or a singular value decomposition.
With that in mind: for any rank-1 operator $A$, there exists a vector $x$ and a functional $f$ such that $A(y) = f(y)\cdot x$ (which I will write as $A = xf(\cdot)$). For any two rank-1 operators $A = xf(\cdot)$ and $B = yg(\cdot)$, we have $$ \begin{align} \operatorname{tr}(A \otimes B) &= \operatorname{tr}([xf(\cdot)] \otimes [yg(\cdot)]) \\ &= \operatorname{tr}([x \otimes y][f(\cdot) \otimes g(\cdot)]) \\ &= [f(\cdot) \otimes g(\cdot)](x \otimes y) \\ & = f(x)g(y) = \operatorname{tr}(xf(\cdot)) \operatorname{tr}(yg(\cdot)) = \operatorname{tr}(A)\operatorname{tr}(B). \end{align} $$ From there, simply use the linearity of the trace function and tensor product. For our original operators $A,B$, we have $$ \begin{align} \operatorname{tr}(A \otimes B) &= \operatorname{tr}\left(\left[\sum_{j}A_j \right] \otimes \left[ \sum_k B_k \right] \right) \\ & = \sum_{j} \sum_k \operatorname{tr}(A_j \otimes B_k) \\ &= \sum_{j} \sum_k \operatorname{tr}(A_j) \operatorname{tr}(B_k) \\ & = \left( \sum_j \operatorname{tr}(A_j) \right) \left(\sum_k \operatorname{tr}(B_k) \right) = \operatorname{tr}(A) \operatorname{tr}(B). \end{align} $$