I am having difficulty translating this fragment from a larger sentence into predicate logic: three pets bathe together.
Let pets be P(x) and B(x,y) be bathe togehter.
How would I deal with the number 3 in this scenario?
I am having difficulty translating this fragment from a larger sentence into predicate logic: three pets bathe together.
Let pets be P(x) and B(x,y) be bathe togehter.
How would I deal with the number 3 in this scenario?
Copyright © 2021 JogjaFile Inc.
Let us say "Two pets bathe together."
$\qquad\exists x~\exists y~\big(x\,{\neq}\,y\land P(x)\land P(y)\land B(x,y)\big)$
"There exists two distinct animals which are both pets, and they bathe together."
Now to say it for three is just a little more busy.
$\qquad\exists x~\exists y~\exists z~\big(x\,{\neq}\,y\land x\,{\neq}\, z\land y\,{\neq}\, z\land P(x)\land P(y)\land P(z)\land B(x,y)\land B(x,z)\land B(y,z)\big)$
Remark: If the "Bathe together" predicate is irreflexive, then it will make the inequality redundant. (Ie: When we interpret it to be that no animal may "Bathe Together" with itself, then that will ensure distinctness.)