Let $R$ be the circumradius and $r$ be the inradius. The if part is clear to me. For an equilateral triangle, the circumcentre, the incentre and the centroid are the same point. So, by property of cebntroid $AG:GD=2:1\Rightarrow AG=2GD$. Thus $R=2r$.

But is the converse true? Whether $R=2r$ implies that the triangle must be equilateral ? We know some relations involving circumradius and inradius, like $R=\dfrac{abc}{4\Delta}, r=\dfrac{\Delta}{s}$, where $\Delta$ is the area of the triangle and $s$ is its semi-perimeter i.e. $s=\dfrac{a+b+c}{2}$. But then how to show that the triangle is equilateral if $R=2r$.
I would be thankful if anyone can help me.

For a given perimeter, an equilateral triangle uniquely maximizes the inradius and minimizes the circumradius. Hence it is the only triangle in which $R=2r$, and all other triangles have $R>2r$.
The statement for the inradius is not hard to see: $r=\dfrac{\Delta}{s}$, and for a fixed perimeter the equilateral triangle uniquely maximizes the area $\Delta$, so it also uniquely maximizes $r$ since $s$ is fixed. However, things are a bit more tricky when it comes to proving that the circumradius is minimized, so I'll reference you to the Math.SE post here as a guide to that proof.