Trying to prove by induction that $\sum_{i=1}^{k} F_{2i}=F_{2k+1}-1$ for all $k∈N$

346 Views Asked by At

I am trying to prove by induction the following proposition of the fibonacci sequence:

The fibonacci sequence is defined recursively as: $f_1 = 1$, $f_2 = 1$, and that for all integers $k>=1$, $f_{k+1} = f_{k+1} +f_k $

Propostion I am trying to prove:

$\sum_{i=1}^{k} F_{2i}=F_{2k+1}-1$ for all $k∈N$

So far I have this:

Base case:

For $F_1$: $\sum_{i=1}^{k} F_{2i}$ = $F_{2(1)}$ = $F_{2}$ This is true.

Induction Hypothesis:

$\sum_{i=1}^{n+1} F_{2i}$ = $F_{2(n+1)}$

I am not sure if what I have so far is correct.

I have brainstormed this also:

That $f_2 = f_3 - 1$. And that $f_2\:+\:f_4\:+\ldots+f_{2n}=f_{2n+1}-1$. By adding $f_{2n+2}$ to both sides, you get $f_2\:+\:f_4\:+...+f_{2n} + f_{2n+2}= f_{2n+2}+f_{2n+1}-1$. And $f_{2n+2}+f_{2n+1} = f_{2n+3}$.

I am not sure how to prove the proposition by induction properly. I have a general understanding of how induction works and why the proposition is true, but I am having trouble proving it with induction steps. I think I need to somehow get to $f_{2n} = f_{2(n+1)+1}-1$, but I am struggling with that. I haven't practiced much strong induction yet, so I am only looking for a simple proof. To provide context as to why I am doing this exercise: I am planning to use this proof as a base for me to refer back to when doing more complex proofs that also involve the fibonacci sequence.

Thank you for all the help or any proofs provided.

1

There are 1 best solutions below

3
On BEST ANSWER

We want to prove $\varphi(n)$ for all $n\ge1$, with $\varphi(n)$ meaning $\sum_{i=1}^nF_{2i}=F_{2n+1}-1$. The principle of mathematical induction states that if $\varphi(1)$ (base case) and $\forall k\ge1(\varphi(k)\to\varphi(k+1))$ (induction step), $\forall n\ge1(\varphi(n))$. Your calculations have proved the base case $F_2=F_3-1$ and the induction step viz.$$\sum_{i=1}^kF_{2i}=F_{2k+1}-1\implies\sum_{i=1}^{k+1}F_{2i}=\sum_{i=1}^kF_{2i}+F_{2k+2}=F_{2k+1}-1+F_{2k+2}=F_{2k+3}-1,$$so you're done.

(The principle is usually stated as starting at $0$; $\varphi(0)$ equates an empty sum, i.e. $0$, to $F_1-1$, so we could have taken an $n=0$ base step. But based on your calculations I started at $n=1$, which is a common definition of $\Bbb N$.)