I want to prove that $\lim_{x \to a} c f(x) = c \lim_{x \to a} f(x)$ for nonzero $c$.
Let $\lim_{x \to a} f(x) = L$. Then there exists a $\delta$ such that $|f(x) - L| < \epsilon$ whenever $0 < |x-a| < \delta$.
Since we have $c\lim_{x \to a} f(x) = cL$ this also means $\lim_{x \to a} c f(x) = c L$ from the problem statement.
So there also exists a $\delta_1$ such that $|cf(x) - cL| < \epsilon_1$ whenever $0<|x-a|<\delta_1$. Dividing by $|c|$ we rephrase: There also exists a $\delta_1$ such that $|f(x) - L| < \frac{\epsilon_1}{|c|}$ whenever $0<|x-a|<\delta_1$.
Stuck here. I know we have $|f(x)-L|$ in both pieces now but all this tells me is that $\delta$ implies $|f(x) - L| < \epsilon$ and $\delta_1$ implies $|f(x) - L| < \frac{\epsilon_1}{|c|}$. I don't think this is enough to show they are related or equivalent.
Is it enough to say let $\epsilon_1 = |c| \epsilon$ and let $\delta_1 = \delta$? Are we even allowed to do that?
We are given that $\lim_{x \to a} f(x) = L$ that is
and we have to show that $\lim_{x \to a} c f(x) = c L$.
To prove it we need to find
and since
by the definition of limit it suffices set $\epsilon_3=\frac{\epsilon_1}{|c|}$ to assure that $\exists \delta_3$ such that $|f(x) - L| < \epsilon_3$ whenever $0 < |x-a| < \delta_3$.
Then it suffice assume $\delta_1=\delta_3$.