Two different definitions of function?

211 Views Asked by At

Let $f$ be a function with domain $A$ and codomain $B$.

It seems that there are two formal definitions of a function:

  1. As a set of ordered pairs: $f=S\subseteq A\times B$
  2. As an ordered triple: $f=(A,B,S)$.

Consider these two functions:

  • $f:\mathbb \{0\} \rightarrow \mathbb R$ defined by $f(x)=1$
  • $g:\mathbb \{0\} \rightarrow \mathbb R^+_0$ defined by $g(x)=1$

Under Definition 1, $f=g=\{(0,1)\}$.

But under Definition 2, $f \neq g$ because $f=(\{0\},\mathbb R,\{(0,1)\})$, while $g=(\{0\},\mathbb R^+_0,\{(0,1)\})$.

So, which is the "correct" definition that we should use?

1

There are 1 best solutions below

4
On

You are misinterpreting your first definition. The function is not $S $, but $S $ as a subset of $A\times B $. And your $f $ and $g $ have different $B$.

The codomain is part of the definition of function. Functions with the same domain and "rule" (i,e., same formula or same $S $) but distinct codomains are not equal.