As I came across that completeness is equivalent to closeness of a subspace if the whole space is complete, I was wondering if I can prove or disprove that the completness of a subspace also can give completness of the whole space.
One problem was, as I tried different approaches, that the norm was not a valid one for the bigger space. I also tried artificial examples as $C([0,1])$ with the $L_2$-norm that is not complete to intersect with some $L_p$ space to get something. My intuition is telling me that it shouldn't be true.
Can someone help me or give me a hint? Thanks in advance!
EDIT: Sorry, I forgot to mention that the subspace should be NOT finite. Because, as Lord Shark the Unknown mentioned, every finite-dimensional subspace of a normed space is complete.
Let $U$ be any Banach space with norm $\|\cdot\|_U.$ Let $V$ be a normed linear space that is not complete, with norm $\|\cdot \|_V$ and origin $0_V.$
Let $X=U\times V$ with $\|(u,v)\|_X=\|u\|_U+\|v\|_V.$ Then $U\times \{0_V\}$ is a closed linear subspace of $X,$ and is complete because it is isometrically isomorphic to $U.$ But $X$ is not complete.