I'm reading the proof of the lemma 3.4 in the Bruguieres' paper on Hopf monads which claims the following:
Lemma Let $F,G: \mathcal{C} \rightarrow \mathcal{D}$ be two strong monoidal functors and $\alpha: F\Rightarrow G$ a monoidal natural transformation. If $\mathcal{C}$ is left (or right) rigid, then $\alpha$ is a natural isomorphism.
In the proof, they claim the following: $${}^{\vee}\alpha_Y\alpha_X=(e_G(\alpha_X\otimes \alpha_Y)\otimes \mathrm{id}_{F(X)})(\mathrm{id}_{F(X)}\otimes d_F),$$ and $$\alpha_X{}^{\vee}\alpha_Y=(e_G\otimes \mathrm{id}_{G(X)})(\mathrm{id}_{G(X)}\otimes(\alpha_Y\otimes \alpha_X))d_F)$$
where $Y$ is the left (resp. right) dual of $X$ and $e_G, d_F$ denote evaluation and coevaluation morphisms obtained from $F,G$.
I try to understand why, but I can't see it.
Notation:
Answer:
The only non-trivial step in your question is to show the identity: $$e_G\circ (\alpha_X \otimes \alpha_Y) = e_F.$$ To prove this first use monoidality of $\alpha$: $$e_F\circ (\alpha_X\otimes \alpha_Y) = G_0\circ G(\mathrm{ev})\circ G_2^{-1}\circ (\alpha_{X}\otimes \alpha_Y) = G_0\circ G(\mathrm{ev})\circ \alpha_{X\otimes Y} \circ F_{2}^{-1}$$ and now that $\alpha$ is natural: $$G_0\circ G(\mathrm{ev})\circ \alpha_{X\otimes Y} \circ F_{2}^{-1} = G_0 \circ \alpha_{\mathbb{1}} \circ F(ev)\circ F_{2}^{-1} = e_F.$$ In the last step we used again that $\alpha$ is monoidal.
(The second equation follows similarly.)